Literature DB >> 11914186

Flexible matching strategies to increase power and efficiency to detect and estimate gene-environment interactions in case-control studies.

Til Stürmer1, Hermann Brenner.   

Abstract

Lack of power is a pertinent problem in many case-control studies of gene-environment interactions. The authors recently introduced the concept of flexible matching strategies with varying proportions of a matching factor among selected controls (degree of matching) to increase the power and efficiency of case-control studies. In this study, they extended the concept of flexible matching strategies to the field of gene-environment interactions. They assessed the power and efficiency of such studies to detect and estimate gene-environment interactions under a variety of assumptions regarding the prevalence and effects of the environmental exposure and the genetic susceptibility as well as their association in the population. For each set of parameters, 10,000 case-control studies were simulated using varying degrees of matching. Traditional frequency matching increased the power and precision in most scenarios, but even greater gains were often obtained by increasing the prevalence of the environmental exposure in controls above the one in cases. The authors concluded that flexible matching strategies can increase the power and efficiency of case-control studies to detect and estimate gene-environment interactions compared with traditional frequency matching and therefore might help to alleviate the notorious lack of power of these studies in specific situations.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914186     DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.7.593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  10 in total

Review 1.  Sample size estimation in research with dependent measures and dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin L Delucchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  [Minimum requirements for high quality reporting of medical research results : CONSORT, STROBE and PRISMA statements].

Authors:  A Stevanovic; M Coburn; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Adjustments for unmeasured confounders in pharmacoepidemiologic database studies using external information.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Robert J Glynn; Kenneth J Rothman; Jerry Avorn; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Sample Size and Power Calculations for Additive Interactions.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2012-08-01

5.  Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; J M Sargeant; I R Dohoo; H N Erb; M Cevallos; M Egger; A K Ersbøll; S W Martin; L R Nielsen; D L Pearl; D U Pfeiffer; J Sanchez; M E Torrence; H Vigre; C Waldner; M P Ward
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Theory and methodology: essential tools that can become dangerous belief systems.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Nicholas Patrick Jewell; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Genes and Environmental Exposures in Veterans with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: the GENEVA study. Rationale, study design and demographic characteristics.

Authors:  Silke Schmidt; Kelli D Allen; Valerie T Loiacono; Barbara Norman; Catherine L Stanwyck; Kristina M Nord; Christina D Williams; Edward J Kasarskis; Freya Kamel; Valerie McGuire; Lorene M Nelson; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  STROGAR - STrengthening the Reporting Of Genetic Association studies in Radiogenomics.

Authors:  Sarah L Kerns; Dirk de Ruysscher; Christian N Andreassen; David Azria; Gillian C Barnett; Jenny Chang-Claude; Susan Davidson; Joseph O Deasy; Alison M Dunning; Harry Ostrer; Barry S Rosenstein; Catharine M L West; Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Risk Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Healthcare Personnel, May-December 2020.

Authors:  Nora Chea; Cedric J Brown; Taniece Eure; Rebecca Alkis Ramirez; Gregory Blazek; Austin R Penna; Ruoran Li; Christopher A Czaja; Helen Johnston; Devra Barter; Betsy Feighner Miller; Kathleen Angell; Kristen E Marshall; Ashley Fell; Sara Lovett; Sarah Lim; Ruth Lynfield; Sarah Shrum Davis; Erin C Phipps; Marla Sievers; Ghinwa Dumyati; Cathleen Concannon; Kathryn McCullough; Amy Woods; Sandhya Seshadri; Christopher Myers; Rebecca Pierce; Valerie L S Ocampo; Judith A Guzman-Cottrill; Gabriela Escutia; Monika Samper; Nicola D Thompson; Shelley S Magill; Cheri T Grigg
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.