Literature DB >> 11912399

Long-term risk of re-treatment of patients using alpha-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms.

Jean J M C H de la Rosette1, Barbara B M Kortmann, Cristina Rossi, Gabe S Sonke, Diamandis L Floratos, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The efficacy of alpha-adrenoceptor blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms has been proven in numerous studies. However, little is known about the efficacy of the longer term. We investigated the long-term risk of re-treatment in patients using alpha-adrenoceptor blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms and the parameters that influence this risk.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the files of 316 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms treated at our department with the alpha-blockers terazosin, alfuzosin or tamsulosin. Using followup data up to 3 years, we calculated re-treatment percentages in each treatment group. Using extended followup of 5 years, we calculated the predictive value of various baseline characteristics for re-treatment.
RESULTS: The re-treatment rates were 27% for tamsulosin, 37% for alfuzosin and 49% for terazosin. The re-treatment rates of patients with mild, moderate and severe lower urinary tract symptoms were 27%, 33% and 70%, respectively. Patients with a maximum urine flow of less or more than 10 ml. per second had a re-treatment rate of 58% and 47%, respectively. Patients with a prostate volume of less or more than 40 ml. had a re-treatment rate of 48% and 72%, respectively. Patients who were urodynamically unobstructed versus obstructed patients had a re-treatment rate of 44% and 59%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients given alpha-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms have a high risk of re-treatment. Tamsulosin has a markedly lower re-treatment percentage than alfuzosin and terazosin. Severe symptoms, poor urine flow, an enlarged prostate and urodynamically proven bladder outlet obstruction increase the risk of treatment failure. Preselection of the most suitable candidates for alpha-blockade may reduce this risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912399     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200204000-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

Review 1.  The economics of medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Combination pharmacological therapies for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Seth A Cohen; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Update on the sexual impact of treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  John Roger Bell; Eric Laborde
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: does prostate size matter?

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

5.  Partners agree that the treatment of LUTS reduces patients' bother and improves their quality of life: prospective 12 years follow-up study.

Authors:  Said Fadel Mishriki; Samuel J S Grimsley; Ghulam Nabi; Nicholas Paul Cohen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Medical therapy versus surgery and minimally invasive surgical therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia: what makes better economic sense?

Authors:  Mark D Stovsky; Katherine Rhee; David Hartke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  The long-term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Rachael L DiSantostefano; Andrea K Biddle; John P Lavelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Two-year follow up of silodosin on lower urinary tract functions and symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia based on prostate size: a prospective investigation using urodynamics.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Matsukawa; Shun Takai; Tsuyoshi Majima; Yasuhito Funahashi; Masashi Kato; Tokunori Yamamoto; Momokazu Gotoh
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-06-26

9.  Naftopidil for the treatment of urinary symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Naoya Masumori
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Effect of Shifting from Combination Therapy to Monotherapy of α-Blockers or 5α-Reductase Inhibitors on Prostate Volume and Symptoms in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Hyoung Woo Kim; Dae Geun Moon; Hyun Min Kim; Jong Ho Hwang; Soon Chan Kim; Sam Geuk Nam; Jun Tag Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.