Literature DB >> 11912330

A comparison of problem-based and conventional curricula in nursing education.

Elizabeth Rideout1, Valerie England-Oxford, Barbara Brown, Frances Fothergill-Bourbonnais, Carolyn Ingram, Gerry Benson, Margaret Ross, Angela Coates.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare graduating baccalaureate students in a problem-based curriculum with those in a conventional nursing program with regard to perceived preparation for clinical practice, clinical functioning, knowledge and satisfaction with their education. Prior to graduation, students completed a self-report questionnaire that consisted of five sections and took about 45 minutes to complete. Following graduation, their pass rates on the National Nursing Registration Examination (RN Exam) were also compared. The findings indicated no significant differences in their perceived preparation for nursing practice, although the conventional students scored higher in all areas. There were also no significant differences between the two groups in their perceived clinical functioning, although there was a trend toward higher function in the areas of communication and self-directed learning in the PBL group. There were no statistically significant differences in RN scores. The PBL students scored significantly higher on perceptions of their nursing knowledge, particularly in the areas of individual, family and community health assessment, communication, teaching/learning, and the health care system. The students undertaking the PBL program were more satisfied with their educational experience than their counterparts in the conventional program, indicating higher satisfaction with tutors, level of independence, assessment and program outcomes, but no difference in relation to workload or clarity of expectations. This study contributes to our understanding of the relationship between different educational approaches and student outcomes. It suggests that PBL is an effective approach for educating nurses. Furthermore, it indicates that nursing students in the PBL program, like their counterparts in PBL medical programs, report higher levels of satisfaction. Future studies that are longitudinal in design and rely less on self-report measures would contribute further to our understanding of the benefits and limitations of PBL in nursing education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912330     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014534712178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  5 in total

1.  Students' experiences of learning in relation to didactic strategies during the first year of a nursing programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lars Westin; Annelie J Sundler; Mia Berglund
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Educators' perceptions and views of problem-based learning through simulation.

Authors:  Sidwell Matlala
Journal:  Curationis       Date:  2021-03-10

3.  The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robyn Stone; Simon Cooper; Robyn Cant
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2013-04-03

4.  How does correlation structure differ between real and fabricated data-sets?

Authors:  Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Mahshid Dehghan-Kooshkghazi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Problem-based learning and larger student groups: mutually exclusive or compatible concepts - a pilot study.

Authors:  Martyn P Kingsbury; Joanne S Lymn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.