Literature DB >> 11911849

Bleomycin genotoxicity and amifostine (WR-2721) cell protection in normal leukocytes vs. K562 tumoral cells.

Annamaria Buschini1, Chiara Alessandrini, Anna Martino, Luca Pasini, Vittorio Rizzoli, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Paola Poli, Carlo Rossi.   

Abstract

Recent advances in chemotherapy have focused on the benefit of high dose regimens, increasing the dose intensity of conventional chemotherapy. However, unacceptable cytotoxicity and genotoxicity on normal cells often impairs the proper management of patients. Phosphoaminothiol WR-1065, the active metabolite of amifostine, appears to protect normal cells and tissues against cytotoxic exposure to radiation or chemotherapeutic agents. Nevertheless, there is disagreement in findings on amifostine protection against bleomycin-induced severe side effects which have suggested that amifostine effectiveness against bleomycin-induced genotoxicity in normal leukocytes and tumour line cells K562 be studied. DNA damage was detected by single cell gel electrophoresis (or Comet) assay, a technique able to detect DNA strand breaks, alkali-labile sites and incomplete excision repair events in individual cells and which appears to be an ideal tool for assessing variability in response of different cell types in vitro. WR-2721 appears to selectively protect healthy leukocytes but not K562 tumoral cells. On the other hand, data on the inter- and intra-individual sensitivity to bleomycin and amifostine suggest that individual metabolic/genetic differences and other factors relating to lifestyle may be responsible for response variability. Application of the Comet assay in appropriate clinical settings to test the sensitivity of patients when undergoing chemotherapy appears possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911849     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(01)00926-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  8 in total

1.  Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Plays a Key Role in Rotenone-Induced Apoptotic Death of Neurons.

Authors:  Poonam Goswami; Sonam Gupta; Joyshree Biswas; Neeraj Joshi; Supriya Swarnkar; Chandishwar Nath; Sarika Singh
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Oxidation of the sugar moiety of DNA by ionizing radiation or bleomycin could induce the formation of a cluster DNA lesion.

Authors:  Peggy Regulus; Benoit Duroux; Pierre-Alain Bayle; Alain Favier; Jean Cadet; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Astrocyte activation: a key step in rotenone induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage.

Authors:  Supriya Swarnkar; Sarika Singh; Poonam Goswami; Ramesh Mathur; Ishan K Patro; Chandishwar Nath
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Evaluation of protective effect of amifostine on dacarbazine induced genotoxicity.

Authors:  M Etebari; A Jafarian-Dehkordi; V Lame
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

5.  Iron induced genotoxicity: attenuation by vitamin C and its optimization.

Authors:  Nuzhat Parveen; Shoeb Ahmad; G G Hammad A Shadab
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-30

Review 6.  Combining Pharmacological Countermeasures to Attenuate the Acute Radiation Syndrome-A Concise Review.

Authors:  Michal Hofer; Zuzana Hoferová; Daniel Depeš; Martin Falk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Amifostine protection against mitomycin-induced chromosomal breakage in fanconi anaemia lymphocytes.

Authors:  Ricardo M Camelo; Fernanda S G Kehdy; Carlos E Salas; Miriam T P Lopes
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Inhalative exposure to vanadium pentoxide causes DNA damage in workers: results of a multiple end point study.

Authors:  Veronika A Ehrlich; Armen K Nersesyan; Kambis Atefie; Christine Hoelzl; Franziska Ferk; Julia Bichler; Eva Valic; Andreas Schaffer; Rolf Schulte-Hermann; Michael Fenech; Karl-Heinz Wagner; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.