Literature DB >> 11911755

Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.

.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF) is the leading hospital discharge diagnosis in patients older than 65 years.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous nesiritide, intravenous nitroglycerin, and placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind trial of 489 inpatients with dyspnea at rest from decompensated CHF, including 246 who received pulmonary artery catheterization, that was conducted at 55 community and academic hospitals between October 1999 and July 2000.
INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous nesiritide (n = 204), intravenous nitroglycerin (n = 143), or placebo (n = 142) added to standard medications for 3 hours, followed by nesiritide (n = 278) or nitroglycerin (n = 216) added to standard medication for 24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) among catheterized patients and patient self-evaluation of dyspnea at 3 hours after initiation of study drug among all patients. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of hemodynamic and clinical effects between nesiritide and nitroglycerin at 24 hours.
RESULTS: At 3 hours, the mean (SD) decrease in PCWP from baseline was -5.8 (6.5) mm Hg for nesiritide (vs placebo, P<.001; vs nitroglycerin, P =.03), -3.8 (5.3) mm Hg for nitroglycerin (vs placebo, P =.09), and -2 (4.2) mm Hg for placebo. At 3 hours, nesiritide resulted in improvement in dyspnea compared with placebo (P =.03), but there was no significant difference in dyspnea or global clinical status with nesiritide compared with nitroglycerin. At 24 hours, the reduction in PCWP was greater in the nesiritide group (-8.2 mm Hg) than the nitroglycerin group (-6.3 mm Hg), but patients reported no significant differences in dyspnea and only modest improvement in global clinical status.
CONCLUSION: When added to standard care in patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated CHF, nesiritide improves hemodynamic function and some self-reported symptoms more effectively than intravenous nitroglycerin or placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911755     DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.12.1531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  215 in total

1.  Early changes in clinical characteristics after emergency department therapy for acute heart failure syndromes: identifying patients who do not respond to standard therapy.

Authors:  Sean P Collins; Christopher J Lindsell; Alan B Storrow; Gregory J Fermann; Phillip D Levy; Peter S Pang; Neal Weintraub; W Frank Peacock; Douglas B Sawyer; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  B-type natriuretic peptide: spectrum of application. Nesiritide (recombinant BNP) for heart failure.

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Use of BNP levels in monitoring hospitalized heart failure patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Alan S Maisel
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Novel natriuretic peptides: new compounds and new approaches.

Authors:  Mark W Vogel; Horng H Chen
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  Contemporary strategies in the diagnosis and management of heart failure.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Naveen L Pereira; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Renal and anti-aldosterone actions of vasopressin-2 receptor antagonism and B-type natriuretic peptide in experimental heart failure.

Authors:  Lisa C Costello-Boerrigter; Guido Boerrigter; Alessandro Cataliotti; Gail J Harty; John C Burnett
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Targeting the kidney in acute heart failure: can old drugs provide new benefit? Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF) trial.

Authors:  Horng H Chen; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Kevin J Anstrom; Michael M Givertz; Bradley A Bart; G Michael Felker; Adrian F Hernandez; Kerry L Lee; Eugene Braunwald; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 8.  Safety and efficacy of nesiritide for acute decompensated heart failure: recent literature and upcoming trials.

Authors:  Brian Hiestand; William T Abraham
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Markers of decongestion, dyspnea relief, and clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Authors:  Robb D Kociol; Steven E McNulty; Adrian F Hernandez; Kerry L Lee; Margaret M Redfield; Russell P Tracy; Eugene Braunwald; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Improvements in signs and symptoms during hospitalization for acute heart failure follow different patterns and depend on the measurement scales used: an international, prospective registry to evaluate the evolution of measures of disease severity in acute heart failure (MEASURE-AHF).

Authors:  Larry A Allen; Marco Metra; Olga Milo-Cotter; Gerasimos Filippatos; Leonardo H Reisin; Daniel R Bensimhon; Edoardo G Gronda; Paolo Colombo; G Michael Felker; Livio Dei Cas; Dimitrios T Kremastinos; Christopher M O'Connor; Gadi Cotter; Beth A Davison; Howard C Dittrich; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.