Literature DB >> 11911597

Documentation and evaluation of adverse drug reactions (ADR)--contribution from a poison information center.

C Mey1, H Hentschel, M Hippius, A Balogh.   

Abstract

The Department of Clinical Pharmacology in Jena is a pharmacovigilance center in a study on intensified spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting. Physicians specialized in clinical pharmacology screen admissions to the Department of Internal Medicine for possible adverse drug reactions. Because of the collaboration between the Pharmacology Department and the nearby Poison Information Center (PIC) in Erfurt the question occurred whether the latter might contribute to adverse drug reaction monitoring. We compared the ADR registered by the intensified spontaneous reporting system in 1999 with those of the PIC during the same period. Each symptom observed was regarded as 1 case. Every suspected drug was also treated separately. The symptoms were classified using adverse reaction terminology. The drugs were classified according to the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification index. The causality assessment was based upon bibliographic data and the method of Bégaud et al. [1985]. Only possible, probable or very probable ADR were compared. The PIC registered mainly psychiatric and nervous system disorders sedation and extrapyramidal disorders were the most frequent reactions - unlike the pharmacovigilance study which registered primarily gastrointestinal and heart rate disorders. The PIC registered mainly drugs used in the therapy of disorders of the central nervous system, i.e. mostly psycholeptics and drugs acting on the alimentary tract, mostly anticholinergics. Drugs for the therapy of sensory organs disorders were frequent owing to the systemic and local adverse drug effects of anticholinergic mydriatics. The PIC and pharmacovigilance centers can benefit from co-operation. The PIC provides easy access to qualified drug information and is thus a useful tool in ADR evaluation. Although the number of adverse reactions assessed was small, their evaluation revealed problems in drug usage which would not otherwise be reported. The evaluation has enlarged the pool of ADR data which is the basis for signal detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  3 in total

Review 1.  Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Andrew M Wilson; Lehana Thabane; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Poisons centres and the reporting of adverse drug events: the case for further development.

Authors:  Glyn N Volans; Lakshman Karalliedde; Heather M Wiseman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Adverse drug reactions reported to the drug and poison information center of Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Saheb Sharif-Askari; Narjes Saheb Sharif-Askari; Mohammadreza Javadi; Kheirollah Gholami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.