Literature DB >> 11911383

Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity.

Ainat Pansky1, Daniel Algom.   

Abstract

It is commonly believed that humans are unable to ignore the meanings of numerical symbols, even when these meanings are irrelevant to the task at hand. In 5 experiments, the authors tested the notion of automatic activation of numerical magnitude by asking participants to compare, while timed, pairs of numerical arrays on either numerosity or numerical value. Garner and Stroop effects were used to gauge the degree of interactive processing. The results showed that both effects were sensitive to the discriminability of values along the constituent dimensions, to the number of stimulus values used, and to practice and motivation. Notably, Stroop and Garner effects were eliminated under several conditions. These findings are incompatible with claims of obligatory activation of meaning in numerical processing, and they cast doubt on theories positing automatic processing of semantic information for alphanumerical symbols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911383     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.2.259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  24 in total

1.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Measuring the allocation of attention in the Stroop task: evidence from eye movement patterns.

Authors:  Bettina Olk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-29

3.  Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task.

Authors:  Glen E Bodner; Audny T Dypvik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

4.  Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ito; Takeshi Hatta
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

6.  Nicotine withdrawal modulates frontal brain function during an affective Stroop task.

Authors:  Brett Froeliger; Leslie Modlin; Lihong Wang; Rachel V Kozink; F Joseph McClernon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Emotional priming effects during Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Sarah J Hart; Steven R Green; Michael Casp; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Developmental trajectories of magnitude processing and interference control: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Guilherme Wood; Anja Ischebeck; Florian Koppelstaetter; Thaddaeus Gotwald; Liane Kaufmann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: evidence for dramatic processing differences.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-05

10.  Impairments of probabilistic response reversal and passive avoidance following catecholamine depletion.

Authors:  Gregor Hasler; Krystal Mondillo; Wayne C Drevets; James R Blair
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.