Literature DB >> 11911354

Relationship between acid reflux episodes and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms is very inconstant.

E Colas-Atger1, B Bonaz, E Papillon, N Gueddah, A Rolachon, R Bost, J Fournet.   

Abstract

In this prospective study 244 consecutive patients presenting with typical and chronic signs of gastroesophageal reflux were included. Conventional 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring was carried out to establish the symptom association probability, the concordance index, and the symptom sensitivity index. The symptom association probability could be calculated in 110 patients (45%). Two groups were identified: group 1 had normal duration of esophageal acid exposure; subgroup la (nonsignificant symptom association probability) included 39 patients (35.5%) and subgroup lb (significant symptom association probability) included 24 patients (21.8%); group 2 had abnormal duration of esophageal acid exposure; subgroup 2a (nonsignificant symptom association probability) included 21 patients (19.1%) and subgroup 2b (significant symptom association probability) included 26 patients (23.6%). In all, 56.6% of the patients presented typical symptoms of reflux not directly determined by one or repeated acid reflux episodes. The correlation between symptom association probability and the symptom sensitivity index allows for more accurate determination of esophageal acid sensitivity (subgroups lb and 2b).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911354     DOI: 10.1023/a:1017940724692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  13 in total

1.  A comparison of gastro-oesophageal reflux in volunteers assessed by ambulatory pH and gamma monitoring after treatment with either Liquid Gaviscon or Algicon Suspension.

Authors:  N Washington; J L Greaves; S Y Iftikhar
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 2.  Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical?

Authors:  D Armstrong; C Emde; W Inauen; A L Blum
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1992-02

3.  Patterns of gas and liquid reflux during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Silny; R H Holloway; J J Janssens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy people.

Authors:  M D Kaye
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Reflux related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal exposure to acid.

Authors:  G Shi; S Bruley des Varannes; C Scarpignato; M Le Rhun; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data.

Authors:  B L Weusten; J M Roelofs; L M Akkermans; G P Van Berge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings v provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin.

Authors:  G Ghillebert; J Janssens; G Vantrappen; F Nevens; J Piessens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Non-invasive detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux using an ambulatory system.

Authors:  N Washington; H A Moss; C Washington; J L Greaves; R J Steele; C G Wilson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  The symptom sensitivity index: a valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording.

Authors:  R Breumelhof; A J Smout
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Symptom association probability and symptom sensitivity index: preferable but still suboptimal predictors of response to high dose omeprazole.

Authors:  S A Taghavi; M Ghasedi; M Saberi-Firoozi; M Alizadeh-Naeeni; K Bagheri-Lankarani; M J Kaviani; L Hamidpour
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jin-Yan Luo; Lei Dong; Jun Gong; Ai-Li Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Long-term therapeutic outcome of patients undergoing ambulatory pH monitoring for chronic unexplained cough.

Authors:  Michael J Hersh; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Lack of correlation between a self-administered subjective GERD questionnaire and pathologic GERD diagnosed by 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Kevin Chan; Geoffrey Liu; Linda Miller; Clement Ma; Wei Xu; Christopher M Schlachta; Gail Darling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Temporal correlation between chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Andrew W Wunderlich; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.