Literature DB >> 11911296

Acquisition of multidrug resistance in recurrent breast cancer demonstrated by the histoculture drug response assay.

H Tanino1, S Oura, R M Hoffman, T Kubota, T Furukawa, J Arimoto, T Yoshimasu, I Hirai, T Bessho, T Suzuma, T Sakurai, Y Naito.   

Abstract

Recurrent breast cancer has a very poor response rate to chemotherapy. To understand the degree of acquisition of multidrug resistance in recurrent disease, 24 recurrent breast tumors and 127 primary tumors were evaluated and compared for chemosensitivity in the histoculture drug response assay (HDRA). The evaluation rate was 98.8%. The HDRA utilizes 3-dimensional culture of human tumors on collagen-gel rafts. Doxorubicin (DXR), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) were tested as standard agents and cisplatin (CDDP) as a candidate agent on surgical specimen of breast cancer in the HDRA. In vitro drug exposure in the HDRA was for 7 days. At the end of the assay, tumor response was assessed by the reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). The mean inhibition rates of primary tumors vs. recurrent tumors were 57.9% and 38.6% for DXR (p<0.0005); 59.9% and 42.8% for MMC (p<0.01); 49.0% and 33.4% for 5-FU (p<0.01); and 34.5% and 16.0% for CDDP (p<0.005), respectively. The recurrent cases were pretreated clinically with CAF (cyclophosphamide, DXR and 5-FU), CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-FU) or CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-FU). In the CAF and CEF group, the HDRA sensitivity to CDDP was significantly lower in recurrent disease (p<0.005) than that of primary breast cancer suggesting that one agent can induce resistance to another. This is further suggested by the fact that 64.7% of the recurrent cases were resistant to all 4 agents tested as opposed to 27% of the primary cases and that only 5.9% of the recurrent cases were sensitive to three or more agents as opposed to 18% of the primary cases. The correlation of the HDRA results to clinical outcome in the study was 80.0% with 15 cases evaluated consisting of 5 true positives, 3 false positives, 7 true negatives and no false negatives. Thus, the HDRA gives useful clinical information, in particular for the specific individualized treatment design necessary to overcome the multidrug resistance problem of recurrent breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11911296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  8 in total

1.  Combination of histoculture drug response assay and qPCR as an effective method to screen biomarkers for personalized chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Bin Wei; Jiru Wang; Xiaohui Zhang; Zhaoye Qian; Jingjing Wu; Yuan Sun; Qin Han; Li Wan; Jing Zhu; Yong Gao; Xiaofei Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Factors affecting platinum sensitivity in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Rina Kato; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yutaka Torii; Yasuhiro Udagawa; Ichio Fukasawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Antitumor effect of BPR-DC-2, a novel synthetic cyclic cyanoguanidine derivative, involving the inhibition of MDR-1 expression and down-regulation of p-AKT and PARP-1 in lung cancer.

Authors:  Shun-Lai Li; Chia-Hsin Huang; Chih-Chan Lin; Zih-Ning Huang; Jyh-Haur Chern; Hsiao-Yin Lien; Yong-Yi Wu; Chia-Hui Cheng; Chia-Yu Chang; Jiunn-Jye Chuu
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A novel 96well-formatted micro-gap plate enabling drug response profiling on primary tumour samples.

Authors:  Wei-Yuan Ma; Lo-Chang Hsiung; Chen-Ho Wang; Chi-Ling Chiang; Ching-Hung Lin; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Andrew M Wo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Quantitative Evaluation of Hormesis in Breast Cancer Using Histoculture Drug Response Assay.

Authors:  Yuka Aoishi; Tatsuya Yoshimasu; Shoji Oura; Mitsumasa Kawago; Yoshimitsu Hirai; Miwako Miyasaka; Takuya Ohashi; Yoshiharu Nishimura
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Christophe Bounaix Morand du Puch; Mathieu Vanderstraete; Stéphanie Giraud; Christophe Lautrette; Niki Christou; Muriel Mathonnet
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  Synergistic anticancer effects of polyphyllin I and evodiamine on freshly-removed human gastric tumors.

Authors:  Guofeng Yue; Jia Wei; Xiaoping Qian; Lixia Yu; Zhengyun Zou; Wenxian Guan; Hao Wang; Jie Shen; Baorui Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A three-gene signature as potential predictive biomarker for irinotecan sensitivity in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Jia Wei; Hao Wang; Guofeng Yue; Lixia Yu; Yang Yang; Li Xie; Zhengyun Zou; Xiaoping Qian; Yitao Ding; Wenxian Guan; Baorui Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.