Literature DB >> 11910365

Validity of randomized clinical trials in gastroenterology from 1964-2000.

Lise L Kjaergard1, Sarah L Frederiksen, Christian Gluud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The internal validity of clinical trials depends on the adequacy of the reported methodological quality. We assessed the methodological quality of all 383 randomized clinical trials published in GASTROENTEROLOGY as original articles from 1964 to 2000.
METHODS: The methodological quality (randomization and blinding), sample size, publication year, and disease area were extracted from each trial. Changes during the study period were analyzed by analysis of variance with adjustments for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Forty-two percent of all trials reported adequate generation of the allocation sequence, 39% reported adequate allocation concealment, and 62% were double blind. The reported methodological quality improved significantly in the mid-1990s.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows a positive development, but the reported methodological quality of trials can still be improved.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11910365     DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.32390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mortality from cirrhosis: lack of progress over the last 35 years.

Authors:  C Gluud
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Internal validity of randomized controlled trials reported in major gastrointestinal and surgical endoscopy journals in 2008.

Authors:  Yu Bai; Yong-Fa Wu; Dong Wang; Yang Xia; Jun Gao; Duo-Wu Zou; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Methodological reporting of randomized controlled trials in major hepato-gastroenterology journals in 2008 and 1998: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ji-Lin Wang; Tian-Tian Sun; Yan-Wei Lin; Rong Lu; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  The fading of reported effectiveness. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Bernhard T Gehr; Christel Weiss; Franz Porzsolt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years.

Authors:  Christian Gluud; Dimitrinka Nikolova
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products.

Authors:  Tannis Jurgens; Anne Marie Whelan; Melissa MacDonald; Lindsay Lord
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.