Literature DB >> 11910306

Heterogeneity of autonomic regulation in hypertension and neurovascular contact.

Jens Jordan1, Jens Tank, Hennriette Hohenbleicher, Hakan Toka, Christoph Schröder, Arya M Sharma, Friedrich C Luft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brainstem neurovascular contact (NVC) may interfere with central autonomic regulation and contribute to essential hypertension. We have previously shown that patients with autosomal-dominant hypertension, brachydactyly, and NVC feature extreme phenylephrine hypersensitivity due to impaired baroreflex buffering. We tested the hypothesis that similar abnormalities are present in patients with essential hypertension who have NVC.
METHODS: Six patients with NVC and essential hypertension and five patients with NVC and monogenic hypertension and brachydactyly were studied. Responses to incremental phenylephrine doses were assessed before and during ganglionic blockade with trimethaphan.
RESULTS: Supine blood pressure was 172 +/- 8.8/89 +/- 6.1 mmHg before ganglionic blockade. Blood pressure decreased 47 +/- 5/18 +/- 3 mmHg with trimethaphan (16 +/- 4.4/4 +/- 4.0 mmHg in autosomal-dominant hypertension, P < 0.05). Before ganglionic blockade, 25 microg phenylephrine increased systolic blood pressure 17 +/- 4 mmHg in patients with essential hypertension and 30 +/- 3 mmHg in patients with autosomal-dominant hypertension (P < 0.05). During ganglionic blockade, the same dose increased systolic blood pressure 32 +/- 1 and 33 +/- 4 mmHg in patients with essential and with autosomal-dominant hypertension, respectively (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Phenylephrine hypersensitivity due to baroreflex dysfunction is uncommon in patients with essential hypertension and NVC. This finding may suggest that the effect of NVC on autonomic regulation is heterogeneous. An alternative explanation is that radiological NVC is not necessarily functionally relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11910306     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200204000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  6 in total

1.  Rebuttal from Jens Jordan.

Authors:  Jens Jordan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Device-Based Approaches for the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Jens Jordan
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Electrical carotid sinus stimulation may get lost in translation.

Authors:  Jens Jordan; Jens Tank
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  [Baroreceptor activation therapy for therapy-resistant hypertension: indications and patient selection : Recommendations of the BAT consensus group 2017].

Authors:  M Koziolek; J Beige; M Wallbach; D Zenker; G Henning; M Halbach; N Mader; F Mahfoud; G Schlieper; V Schwenger; M Hausberg; J Börgel; M Lodde; M van der Giet; J Müller-Ehmsen; J Passauer; S Parmentier; S Lüders; B K Krämer; S Büttner; F Limbourg; J Jordan; O Vonend; H-G Predel; H Reuter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Acute Response to Unilateral Unipolar Electrical Carotid Sinus Stimulation in Patients With Resistant Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Karsten Heusser; Jens Tank; Julia Brinkmann; Jan Menne; Jessica Kaufeld; Silvia Linnenweber-Held; Joachim Beige; Mathias Wilhelmi; André Diedrich; Hermann Haller; Jens Jordan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Endovascular baroreflex amplification and the effect on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with resistant hypertension: A proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Monique E A M van Kleef; Karsten Heusser; André Diedrich; P Liam Oey; Jens Tank; Jens Jordan; Peter J Blankestijn; Bryan Williams; Wilko Spiering
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.