Literature DB >> 11909757

The genotoxicity of priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in complex mixtures.

Paul A White1.   

Abstract

Risk assessment of complex environmental samples suffers from difficulty in identifying toxic components, inadequacy of available toxicity data, and a paucity of knowledge about the behavior of geno(toxic) substances in complex mixtures. Lack of information about the behavior of toxic substances in complex mixtures is often avoided by assuming that the toxicity of a mixture is simply the sum of the expected effects from each mixture component, i.e. no synergistic or antagonistic interactions. Although this assumption is supported by research investigating non-genotoxic end-points, the literature describing the behavior of genotoxic substances in complex mixtures is sparse and, occasionally, contradictory. In this study, the results of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) analyses on freshwater bivalves were used to prepare realistic mixtures containing up to 16 PAHs. The SOS genotoxicity of the mixtures and each component were then assessed in an effort to evaluate the additivity of PAH genotoxicity. At nominal PAH concentrations above 1 microg/ml, observed genotoxic responses were far lower than those predicted under the assumption of additivity. At nominal concentrations below 0.75 microg/ml, differences are smaller and occasionally negligible, indicating that the genotoxicity of unsubstituted homocyclic PAHs is additive or slightly less than additive. Other researchers who have investigated the mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and DNA binding activity of mixtures containing unsubstituted homocyclic PAHs have also reported additive effects. Therefore, the mutagenic risk posed by simple, well-characterized mixtures of priority PAHs can reasonably be estimated as the sum of the risks posed by the mixture components. Current data indicate that less-than-additive effects likely result from saturation of metabolic pathways needed to activate mutagenic PAHs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11909757     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00017-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  23 in total

1.  Genotoxic assessment of selected native plants to deferentially exposed urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Andrea Pogányova; Karol Mičieta; Jozef Dušička
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evaluating the effects of bioremediation on genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using genetically engineered, higher eukaryotic cell lines.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Jun Nakamura; Stephen D Richardson; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Is Caenorhabditis elegans representative of freshwater nematode species in toxicity testing?

Authors:  Arne Haegerbaeumer; Sebastian Höss; Peter Heininger; Walter Traunspurger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Cyto- and genotoxic potential of water samples from polluted areas in Kosovo.

Authors:  Avdulla J Alija; Ismet D Bajraktari; Nikolaus Bresgen; Ekramije Bojaxhi; Margit Krenn; Fisnik Asllani; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Genotoxicity of the sediments collected from Pearl River in China and their polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals.

Authors:  Shaolong Feng; Bixian Mai; Gangjian Wei; Xinming Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Formation of Developmentally Toxic Phenanthrene Metabolite Mixtures by Mycobacterium sp. ELW1.

Authors:  Jill E Schrlau; Amber L Kramer; Anna Chlebowski; Lisa Truong; Robert L Tanguay; Staci L Massey Simonich; Lewis Semprini
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Treatment technologies for PAH-contaminated sites: a critical review.

Authors:  Saeid Gitipour; George A Sorial; Soroush Ghasemi; Mahdieh Bazyari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 8.  Polyaromatic hydrocarbon exposure: an ecological impact ambiguity.

Authors:  Andrew Ball; Adam Truskewycz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  The influence of diesel exhaust on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced DNA damage, gene expression, and tumor initiation in Sencar mice in vivo.

Authors:  Lauren A Courter; Andreas Luch; Tamara Musafia-Jeknic; Volker M Arlt; Kay Fischer; Robert Bildfell; Cliff Pereira; David H Phillips; Miriam C Poirier; William M Baird
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  Genotoxicity evaluation of water soil leachates by Ames test, comet assay, and preliminary Tradescantia micronucleus assay.

Authors:  B Lah; T Vidic; E Glasencnik; T Cepeljnik; G Gorjanc; Romana Marinsek-Logar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.