Literature DB >> 11909564

Usefulness of rest and low-dose dobutamine wall motion scores in predicting survival and benefit from revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Stephen G Sawada1, Stephen J Lewis, Judy Foltz, Agota Ando, Samer Khouri, Shawn Kaser, Irmina Gradus-Pizlo, William Gill, Naomi Fineberg, Douglas Segar, Harvey Feigenbaum.   

Abstract

This study examined the value of wall motion scores at rest and with low- and high-dose dobutamine infusion for prediction of outcome and benefit from revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Follow-up was obtained in 139 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who had echocardiography at rest, and during low- (10 microg/kg/min) and high-dose dobutamine (maximal dose 50 microg/kg/min) infusion. Both rest and low-dose wall motion scores were multivariate predictors of cardiac death, but ischemia and peak dose scores were not predictors. Rest scores risk stratified patients into 3 groups: score (1.00 to 1.99) with 11% cardiac death; score (2.00 to 2.49) with 30% death; and score > or =2.50 with 47% death. One third of patients with rest scores > or =2.50 had improvement in scores to < 2.50 with low-dose dobutamine. Their frequency of cardiac death was reduced to 23% compared with 60% (p = 0.04) in those who remained with low-dose scores > or =2.50. Low-dose scores also identified those who benefited from revascularization. In patients with low-dose scores (1.00 to 1.99), the frequency of cardiac death was marginally lower in revascularized than nonrevascularized patients (10% vs 21%, p = 0.28). In patients with scores (2.00 to 2.49), revascularized patients had a significantly lower frequency of cardiac death than nonrevascularized patients (15% vs 41%, p < 0.05). The frequency of death in those with low-dose scores > or =2.50 was very high in both revascularized (75%) and nonrevascularized (56%, p = 0.42) patients. Thus, rest and low-dose wall motion scores enable risk stratification of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and identify those who do and do not benefit from revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11909564     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02190-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Quantity of viable myocardium required to improve survival with revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoichi Inaba; Jennifer A Chen; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Hypodense regions in unenhanced CT identify nonviable myocardium: validation versus 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Tobias A Fuchs; Jelena R Ghadri; Julia Stehli; Catherine Gebhard; Egle Kazakauskaite; Bernd Klaeser; Oliver Gaemperli; Michael Fiechter; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Assessment of left ventricular function long term after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries by dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  L Hui; A K T Chau; M P Leung; C S W Chiu; Y F Cheung
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Low dose wall motion score predicts the short and long-term benefit of surgical revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasir Abdul Ghaffar; Waddah Maskoun; Nowwar G Mustafa; Harvey Feigenbaum; Stephen G Sawada
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Revascularization in heart failure in the post-STICH era.

Authors:  Saurabh Jha; Scott D Flamm; Deborah H Kwon
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-12

6.  Myocardial viability testing: all STICHed up, or about to be REVIVED?

Authors:  Matthew Ryan; Holly Morgan; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel; John Cleland; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Regional myocardial strain analysis via 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: validation with sonomicrometry and correlation with regional blood flow in the presence of graded coronary stenoses and dobutamine stress.

Authors:  John C Stendahl; Nripesh Parajuli; Allen Lu; Nabil E Boutagy; Nicole Guerrera; Imran Alkhalil; Ben A Lin; Lawrence H Staib; Matthew O'Donnell; James S Duncan; Albert J Sinusas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.