Literature DB >> 11908997

Improvements in gene therapy: averting the immune response to adenoviral vectors.

Thomas Ritter1, Manfred Lehmann, Hans-Dieter Volk.   

Abstract

Gene therapy is an interesting approach for the correction of defective genes, the treatment of cancer and the introduction of immunomodulatory genes. Various techniques for gene transfer into cells or tissues have been developed within the last decade; these can be divided generally into viral and nonviral gene transfer systems. Nonviral techniques include the liposome- or gene gun-mediated introduction of therapeutic genes; however, the efficiency of gene transfer by these applications is still very low. In contrast, viruses have optimised their strategies for efficient infection of virtually any cell type in a mammalian organism. The genetic modification of genomes from different virus families (Adenoviridae, Retroviridae, Herpesviridae) led to the development of gene therapy vectors with a similar capacity to infect cells or tissues as that of wild type viruses. In contrast to wild type viruses, gene therapy vectors are engineered to transfer therapeutic genes into the target cells or tissues. In addition, they have lost their capacity for replication in target cells, because of the removal of essential genes, which allows replication only in specialised packaging cell lines engineered for the production of recombinant viruses. Despite considerable progress over the past decade in the generation of gene transfer systems with reduced immunogenic properties, the remaining immunogenicity of many gene therapy vectors is still the major hurdle, preventing their frequent application in clinical trials. Recombinant adenoviruses have been shown to be promising vectors for gene therapy, since they are able to transduce both quiescent and proliferating cells very efficiently. However, a major disadvantage of adenoviral vectors lies in the activation of both the innate and adaptive parts of the recipient's immune system when applied in vivo. The inflammatory responses induced by adenovirus particles can be very strong and can be fatal in patients treated with these adenoviral constructs. Therefore, many experiments have been performed in the effort to prevent these inflammatory responses mediated by adenoviral particles. The depletion of cell populations responsible for these inflammatory responses as well as the application of immunosuppressive drugs have been investigated. Moreover, the generation of less immunogenic adenoviral vectors by further genetic modification within the adenoviral genome has led to vectors with reduced immunogenic properties. Both strategies to reduce inflammatory responses against adenoviral particles are discussed in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11908997     DOI: 10.2165/00063030-200216010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  21 in total

1.  Construction and characterization of adenovirus serotype 5 packaged by serotype 3 hexon.

Authors:  Hongju Wu; Igor Dmitriev; Elena Kashentseva; Toshiro Seki; Minghui Wang; David T Curiel
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Matrices and scaffolds for DNA delivery in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Laura De Laporte; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Deep RNA sequencing reveals complex transcriptional landscape of a bat adenovirus.

Authors:  Lijun Wu; Peng Zhou; Xingyi Ge; Lin-Fa Wang; Michelle L Baker; Zhengli Shi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Inactivating a cellular intrinsic immune defense mediated by Daxx is the mechanism through which the human cytomegalovirus pp71 protein stimulates viral immediate-early gene expression.

Authors:  Ryan T Saffert; Robert F Kalejta
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  MiR-101a loaded extracellular nanovesicles as bioactive carriers for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Jinli Wang; Christine J Lee; Michael B Deci; Natalie Jasiewicz; Anjali Verma; John M Canty; Juliane Nguyen
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 6.  Translational approaches targeting the p53 pathway for anti-cancer therapy.

Authors:  Frank Essmann; Klaus Schulze-Osthoff
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Biological treatment strategies for disc degeneration: potentials and shortcomings.

Authors:  Günther Paesold; Andreas G Nerlich; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Preclinical mouse models and methods for the discovery of the causes and treatments of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Bernd Hewing; Edward A Fisher
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 9.  A review of gene and stem cell therapy in cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  Ludwik K Branski; Gerd G Gauglitz; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Drug-virus interaction: effect of administration of recombinant adenoviruses on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in a rat model.

Authors:  P Wonganan; W C Zamboni; S Strychor; J D Dekker; M A Croyle
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 5.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.