Literature DB >> 11908792

Adsorption of single and mixed ionic surfactants at fluid interfaces.

V B Fainerman1, E H Lucassen-Reynders.   

Abstract

Two different approaches have been used in the literature to describe the effects of ionisation of surfactants on the surface pressure, pi. One approach is based on a molecular model for a charged monolayer, in which the mutual repulsion of the long-chain surfactant ions results in an additional surface pressure, piel, calculated with the Gouy-Chapman theory for the formation of a diffuse electric double layer, and with counterion binding in the Stern-Helmholtz layer adjacent to the surfactant monolayer. The other approach regards the surface as a two-dimensional solution defined as a Gibbs dividing surface, which is electroneutral by definition. In this approach, the adsorption of any ion is the sum of its excesses in the monolayer and the electrical double layer; no assumptions are made about the spatial distribution of charges. It has been shown that both models can produce a reasonable description of experimental results obtained for solutions of a single ionic surfactant (RX) with or without inorganic electrolyte (XY). In many cases, measurements of pi vs. mean ionic activity at different salt concentrations (cXY) are found to coincide on a single curve, implying that at given mean ionic activity both adsorption and pi are independent of cXY, i.e. that double-layer contributions to the surface pressure are negligible. In addition, the electroneutral 2-D solution approach has resulted in a simple explanation of several typical features of mixed ionic surfactant solutions, in particular for mixtures of anionic and cationic surfactants. In mixed solutions too, double-layer effects appear to be negligible. We present arguments for such negligibility. One reason is a significant degree of binding between adsorbed surface active ions (R) and counterions (X); another is that for 1:1 electrolytes, the contribution of the diffuse double layer to the adsorption of the combination (RX) vanishes. As a result, it is possible to interpret the same experimental data in terms of both models.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 11908792     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(01)00086-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0001-8686            Impact factor:   12.984


  2 in total

Review 1.  Micro-Surface and -Interfacial Tensions Measured Using the Micropipette Technique: Applications in Ultrasound-Microbubbles, Oil-Recovery, Lung-Surfactants, Nanoprecipitation, and Microfluidics.

Authors:  David Needham; Koji Kinoshita; Anders Utoft
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 2.  Surface Tension and Adsorption Studies by Drop Profile Analysis Tensiometry.

Authors:  T Kairaliyeva; E V Aksenenko; N Mucic; A V Makievski; V B Fainerman; Reinhard Miller
Journal:  J Surfactants Deterg       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.902

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.