OBJECTIVES: To determine which aspects of menstrual change best predict time to postmenopause. METHODS: A total of 250 Australian-born women aged 45-55 years were divided into five menstrual status categories: Group I reported no change in menstrual flow or frequency; Group II reported change in flow; Group III reported change in frequency; Group IV reported change in both frequency and flow; and Group V reported between 3 and 11 months of amenorrhea. Menstrual status groups were compared on baseline data for age, hormone levels, hot flushes and self-rated menopausal status. The proportion of women moving to postmenopause in subsequent years was compared using 4 years of follow-up data. RESULTS: Women in Group V were older, had lower estradiol and inhibin levels, higher follicle stimulating hormone levels, and were more likely to report hot flushes, and to self-rate themselves as having started the menopausal transition, compared with the women who had menstruated in the last 3 months (Groups I-IV). Groups I and II were similar in age and hormonal status, as were Groups III and IV. The proportion of women who had moved to postmenopausal status in the 4 years after baseline were 12%, 14%, 58%, 53% and 94% for Groups I-V, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Amenorrhea is the best predictor of future menopause followed by changes in menstrual frequency. Change in flow only was not predictive of future menopause. A two-stage classification scheme is suggested for defining the perimenopause. 'Early perimenopause' is defined as the self-reporting of changes in menstrual frequency over the last year, and 'late perimenopause' is defined as the self-report of 3-11 months of amenorrhea.
OBJECTIVES: To determine which aspects of menstrual change best predict time to postmenopause. METHODS: A total of 250 Australian-born women aged 45-55 years were divided into five menstrual status categories: Group I reported no change in menstrual flow or frequency; Group II reported change in flow; Group III reported change in frequency; Group IV reported change in both frequency and flow; and Group V reported between 3 and 11 months of amenorrhea. Menstrual status groups were compared on baseline data for age, hormone levels, hot flushes and self-rated menopausal status. The proportion of women moving to postmenopause in subsequent years was compared using 4 years of follow-up data. RESULTS:Women in Group V were older, had lower estradiol and inhibin levels, higher follicle stimulating hormone levels, and were more likely to report hot flushes, and to self-rate themselves as having started the menopausal transition, compared with the women who had menstruated in the last 3 months (Groups I-IV). Groups I and II were similar in age and hormonal status, as were Groups III and IV. The proportion of women who had moved to postmenopausal status in the 4 years after baseline were 12%, 14%, 58%, 53% and 94% for Groups I-V, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Amenorrhea is the best predictor of future menopause followed by changes in menstrual frequency. Change in flow only was not predictive of future menopause. A two-stage classification scheme is suggested for defining the perimenopause. 'Early perimenopause' is defined as the self-reporting of changes in menstrual frequency over the last year, and 'late perimenopause' is defined as the self-report of 3-11 months of amenorrhea.
Authors: Mohammad R Hayatbakhsh; Jake M Najman; Michael J O'Callaghan; Gail M Williams; Anita Paydar; Alexandra Clavarino Journal: Lung Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Huiyong Zheng; Siobán D Harlow; Howard M Kravitz; Joyce Bromberger; Daniel J Buysse; Karen A Matthews; Ellen B Gold; Jane F Owens; Martica Hall Journal: Menopause Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Sybil L Crawford; Nancy E Avis; Ellen Gold; Janet Johnston; Jennifer Kelsey; Nanette Santoro; MaryFran Sowers; Barbara Sternfeld Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mary Fran Sowers; Huiyong Zheng; Howard M Kravitz; Karen Matthews; Joyce T Bromberger; Ellen B Gold; Jane Owens; Flavia Consens; Martica Hall Journal: Sleep Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: N Santoro; S L Crawford; W L Lasley; J L Luborsky; K A Matthews; D McConnell; J F Randolph; E B Gold; G A Greendale; S G Korenman; L Powell; M F Sowers; G Weiss Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Carol A Derby; Sybil L Crawford; Richard C Pasternak; Maryfran Sowers; Barbara Sternfeld; Karen A Matthews Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-12-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Shannon M Conroy; Carolyn J Crandall; Gail A Greendale; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.506