PURPOSE: To assess the retrievability of the Günther Tulip temporary inferior vena cava filter from a technical viewpoint, and consider the histopathologic changes that occur at the anchoring site of the filter prongs to the vein endothelium in Landrace pigs. METHODS: Twenty-two Günther Tulip retrievable filters were inserted in 22 experimental Landrace pigs via the jugular vein. Device implantation time was 0, 3, 7, 12, 14, 15, 16, 20, 30, 35 and 56 days. Study subjects were divided into two groups. In one group the filter was retrieved percutaneously via the jugular vein whereas in the other group it was removed surgically. The specimens obtained (vena cava and filter) were histopathologically examined. Prior to filter retrieval, a venacavography was obtained in all cases. Degree of retrieval difficulty was rated as follows: no difficulty (N), slight (S), mild (M), high (H) and unretrievable (U). RESULTS: Of the 22 implanted filters, 11 should have been removed percutaneously but this was impossible in three cases (U). In four cases the device was retrieved with no difficulty (N); in two cases the degree of difficulty was mild (M) and in other two it was high (H) and slight (S) respectively. Retrieval difficulties were observed after 16 days. Starting from day 20, there was evidence of fibrosis with thick intimal proliferation and total filter prong involvement, which accounts for the difficulty in retrieving the device. CONCLUSIONS: It is advisable not to exceed a filter retrieval time of 16 days in view of the fibrotic changes reported. It might be necessary to perform a larger study with more animals and with retrieval times between 14 and 20 days.
PURPOSE: To assess the retrievability of the Günther Tulip temporary inferior vena cava filter from a technical viewpoint, and consider the histopathologic changes that occur at the anchoring site of the filter prongs to the vein endothelium in Landrace pigs. METHODS: Twenty-two Günther Tulip retrievable filters were inserted in 22 experimental Landrace pigs via the jugular vein. Device implantation time was 0, 3, 7, 12, 14, 15, 16, 20, 30, 35 and 56 days. Study subjects were divided into two groups. In one group the filter was retrieved percutaneously via the jugular vein whereas in the other group it was removed surgically. The specimens obtained (vena cava and filter) were histopathologically examined. Prior to filter retrieval, a venacavography was obtained in all cases. Degree of retrieval difficulty was rated as follows: no difficulty (N), slight (S), mild (M), high (H) and unretrievable (U). RESULTS: Of the 22 implanted filters, 11 should have been removed percutaneously but this was impossible in three cases (U). In four cases the device was retrieved with no difficulty (N); in two cases the degree of difficulty was mild (M) and in other two it was high (H) and slight (S) respectively. Retrieval difficulties were observed after 16 days. Starting from day 20, there was evidence of fibrosis with thick intimal proliferation and total filter prong involvement, which accounts for the difficulty in retrieving the device. CONCLUSIONS: It is advisable not to exceed a filter retrieval time of 16 days in view of the fibrotic changes reported. It might be necessary to perform a larger study with more animals and with retrieval times between 14 and 20 days.