Literature DB >> 11907734

Usefulness of power Doppler and contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of hyperechoic renal masses.

G Ascenti1, G Zimbaro, S Mazziotti, M Gaeta, N Settineri, E Scribano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a prospective study, we compared power Doppler with and without contrast medium in the depiction of vascularity for the characterization of hyperechoic renal lesions.
METHODS: Forty-one hyperechoic renal expansive lesions (29 benign, 12 malignant) in 32 patients were studied with power-Doppler ultrasonography before and after administration of an echo-enhancing agent (Levovist Schering AG, Berlin, Germany). Vascular architecture of the lesions was categorized into five different patterns.
RESULTS: Power Doppler ultrasonography showed vascular structures in 25 lesions. The study enhanced with Levovist showed vascularity in eight of 16 lesions not seen on the unenhanced study. The characterization of vascular patterns with unenhanced power Doppler ultrasonography improved diagnostic accuracy compared with gray-scale ultrasonography (59% vs. 32%). The combination of B mode and power Doppler produced even greater diagnostic accuracy (78%), independent of the administration of echo-enhancing agent. Levovist administration was useful in the differential diagnosis between pseudotumor and neoplasm.
CONCLUSION: The use of sonographic contrast agent did not increase the diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler in the differential diagnosis of hyperechoic renal lesions but was advantageous for the characterization of suspected pseudomasses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11907734     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-001-0025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Ultrasound contrast agents].

Authors:  T Albrecht; J Hohmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Ultrasound contrast agents: substance classes, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, safety aspects].

Authors:  C Krestan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Bernd Straub; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidney: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Sheng F Oon; Robert W Foley; Deirdre Quinn; David M Quinlan; Robert G Gibney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Imaging and Management of Incidental Renal Lesions.

Authors:  Silvio Mazziotti; Giuseppe Cicero; Tommaso D'Angelo; Maria Adele Marino; Carmela Visalli; Ignazio Salamone; Giorgio Ascenti; Alfredo Blandino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Vincent Schwarze; Constantin Marschner; Moritz L Schnitzer; Matthias F Froelich; Johannes Rübenthaler; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Differentiation between high- and low-grade urothelial carcinomas using contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Qiuyang Li; Jie Tang; Enhui He; Yanmi Li; Yun Zhou; Baojun Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.