Literature DB >> 11907637

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluvastatin in heart transplant recipients taking cyclosporine A.

J W Park1, R Siekmeier, P Lattke, M Merz, C Mix, S Schüler, W Jaross.   

Abstract

During the last decades, transplantation has become an established tool for the treatment of terminal organ failure. Beside immunological factors, hyperlipidemia is the main problem after heart transplantation, causing rapid transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD) and poor long-term prognosis at the beginning of the transplantation. Heart transplant recipients are now effectively treated with lipid lowering substances, of which HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors are the most potent. However, treatment with these substances correlates with an increased risk for the development of rhabdomyolysis due to therapy with the immunosuppressive cyclosporine A. Our study monitored the safety and efficacy of treatment with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in heart transplant recipients compared to healthy controls. We investigated 10 patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy consisting of cyclosporine A, prednisone, and azathioprine who had increased concentrations of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and 10 age-matched healthy controls. The patients were treated with 40 mg/day fluvastatin for 4 weeks and 20 mg/day for 4 additional weeks. Control individuals received 40 mg/day fluvastatin for 4 weeks only. Parameters of fluvastatin pharmacokinetics (maximum concentration of the drug (C(max.)), time (t(max.)) to reach C(max.), area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0h-24h)), elimination half-life time (t(1/2))), apparent total body clearance (CL), blood cyclosporine A concentration, plasma lipids, and safety parameters were determined in both study groups at the beginning of the study and after 4 weeks. The latter were determined in the patient group also after 8 and 12 weeks. Treatment with 40 mg/day fluvastatin caused a significant decrease in total cholesterol (patients: 5.47 +/- 1.32 mmol/L vs. 7.30 +/- 1.83 mmol/L; controls: 4.69 +/- 0.64 mmol/L vs. 5.81 +/- 0.72 mmol/L), LDL-C (patients: 3.28 +/- 1.25 mmol/L vs. 5.00 +/- 1.85 mmol/L; controls: 2.58 +/- 0.63 mmol/L vs. 3.50 +/- 0.70 mmol/L), and triglycerides (patients: 1.99 +/- 0.77 mmol/L vs. 2.50 +/- 1.00 mmol/L; controls: 1.24 +/- 0.46 mmol/L vs. 1.72 +/- 0.67 mmol/L) in both study groups, whereas HDL-C was not significantly changed (patients: 1.29 +/- 0.35 mmol/L vs. 1.17 +/- 0.32 mmol/L; controls: 1.55 +/- 0.30 mmol/L vs. 1.53 +/- 0.26 mmol/L). Values of C(max.) and AUC(0h-24h) were higher in the patient group than in the control group (day 1, patients vs. controls, C(max.): 869.4 +/- 604.0 ng/mL vs. 211.9 +/- 113.9 ng/mL; AUC(0h-24h): 1948.8 +/- 1347.9 ng/mL*h vs. 549.4 +/- 247.4 ng/mL*h), whereas the corresponding value of CL was lower in the patient group (33.3 +/- 24.5 L/h vs. 107.9 +/- 95.8 L/h), and the values of t(max.) and t(1/2) showed no differences. In addition, values of C(max.) and AUC(0h-24h) after administration of 40 mg/day fluvastatin for 4 weeks in both groups were slightly higher than at the beginning, whereas the value of CL was slightly lower (day 28, patients vs. controls, C(max.): 1530.4 +/- 960.4 ng/mL vs. 254.7 +/- 199.8 ng/mL; AUC(0h-24h): 2615.3 +/- 1379.4 ng/mL*h vs. 841.8 +/- 421.4 ng/mL*h; CL: day 28, 21.4 +/- 15.3 L/h vs. 61.5 +/- 36.6 L/h). Except for an intermittent increase of creatine kinase, safety parameters showed no increases within the observation period. Our data suggest that fluvastatin effectively lowers plasma concentrations of cholesterol and LDL-C in patients after heart transplantation, however, the metabolism of fluvastatin is affected by concomitant therapy with cyclosporine A. Serum concentrations of fluvastatin should be monitored in cases of concomitant therapy with other substances interfering in the metabolism by competing cytochrome enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11907637     DOI: 10.1177/107424840100600404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1074-2484            Impact factor:   2.457


  14 in total

1.  Predicting Clearance Mechanism in Drug Discovery: Extended Clearance Classification System (ECCS).

Authors:  Manthena V Varma; Stefanus J Steyn; Charlotte Allerton; Ayman F El-Kattan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Successful strategy to improve the specificity of electronic statin-drug interaction alerts.

Authors:  Hanna Marita Seidling; Caroline Henrike Storch; Thilo Bertsche; Christian Senger; Jens Kaltschmidt; Ingeborg Walter-Sack; Walter Emil Haefeli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Reliable Rate Measurements for Active and Passive Hepatic Uptake Using Plated Human Hepatocytes.

Authors:  Yi-An Bi; Renato J Scialis; Sarah Lazzaro; Sumathy Mathialagan; Emi Kimoto; Julie Keefer; Hui Zhang; Anna M Vildhede; Chester Costales; A David Rodrigues; Larry M Tremaine; Manthena V S Varma
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Pediatric Statin Administration: Navigating a Frontier with Limited Data.

Authors:  Jonathan Wagner; Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Importance of multi-p450 inhibition in drug-drug interactions: evaluation of incidence, inhibition magnitude, and prediction from in vitro data.

Authors:  Nina Isoherranen; Justin D Lutz; Sophie P Chung; Houda Hachad; Rene H Levy; Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Risk of adverse events among older adults following co-prescription of clarithromycin and statins not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4.

Authors:  Daniel Q Li; Richard Kim; Eric McArthur; Jamie L Fleet; David G Bailey; David Juurlink; Salimah Z Shariff; Tara Gomes; Muhammad Mamdani; Sonja Gandhi; Stephanie Dixon; Amit X Garg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic comparison of the potential over-the-counter statins simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin and pravastatin.

Authors:  Pertti J Neuvonen; Janne T Backman; Mikko Niemi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Impact of OATP transporters on pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Kalliokoski; M Niemi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Prediction of Cyclosporin-Mediated Drug Interaction Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Characterizing Interplay of Drug Transporters and Enzymes.

Authors:  Yiting Yang; Ping Li; Zexin Zhang; Zhongjian Wang; Li Liu; Xiaodong Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Interactions between cyclosporin and lipid-lowering drugs: implications for organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Anders Asberg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.