Literature DB >> 11907472

Outcome study of stereopsis in relation to duration of misalignment in congenital esotropia.

Malcolm R Ing1, Lisa M Okino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A recent outcome study of Randot stereopsis in congenital esotropia reported early surgical alignment is associated with a higher percentage of patients with stereopsis and a higher quality of stereopsis because early surgery minimized the duration of misalignment. We compared the Titmus stereopsis with the duration of misalignment and the age of alignment for a group of patients who were surgically aligned by 24 months of age.
METHODS: The data previously obtained in a study of 90 patients aligned by 2 years of age, examined in a masked, independent evaluation for binocularity was analyzed. The age of alignment and duration of misalignment was correlated with the percentage of patients with stereopsis and quality of the stereopsis result as determined by the Titmus vectograph overlay.
RESULTS: Patients aligned by 6 or 12 months of age or within 6 or 12 months of duration of misalignment did not differ in percentage with stereopsis. However, patients aligned after 12 months of age did show a decrease percentage with stereopsis (P <.05, power 0.8). The quality of the stereopsis that was established was similar for those aligned by 6 or 12 months (P >.05, power 0.8). The quality of stereopsis, however, was decreased for patients with duration of misalignment greater than 12 months (P <.001, power 0.8).
CONCLUSION: Alignment within 1 year of age or within 12 months of misalignment favorably affects the percentage of patients who develop stereopsis in the treatment of congenital esotropia. The quality of the stereopsis result is affected by the duration of the misalignment, rather, than the age of alignment per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11907472     DOI: 10.1067/mpa.2002.120172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  14 in total

1.  Three horizontal muscle surgery for large-angle infantile esotropia: validation of a table of amounts of surgery.

Authors:  J E Camuglia; M J Walsh; G A Gole
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Strabismus surgery before versus after completion of amblyopia therapy in children.

Authors:  Sanita Korah; Swetha Philip; Smitha Jasper; Aileen Antonio-Santos; Andrew Braganza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-15

3.  Influence of timing of initial surgery for infantile esotropia on the severity of dissociated vertical deviation.

Authors:  Teiji Yagasaki; Yoshimi O Yokoyama; Mariko Maeda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Causing and curing infantile esotropia in primates: the role of decorrelated binocular input (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Lawrence Tychsen
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

6.  Timing of surgery for infantile esotropia in humans: effects on cortical motion visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Giuseppe Mirabella; Xiaoqing Li; Thomas Wright; Carol Westall; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Timing of surgery for infantile esotropia: sensory and motor outcomes.

Authors:  Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 8.  Update on squint and amblyopia.

Authors:  G G W Adams; J J Sloper
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 9.  Management of amblyopia in pediatric patients: Current insights.

Authors:  Sagnik Sen; Pallavi Singh; Rohit Saxena
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Fixation eye movement abnormalities and stereopsis recovery following strabismus repair.

Authors:  Talora L Martin; Jordan Murray; Kiran Garg; Charles Gallagher; Aasef G Shaikh; Fatema F Ghasia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.