Literature DB >> 11907428

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in chronic allograft nephropathy.

Julie Lin1, Anthony M Valeri, Glen S Markowitz, Vivette D D'Agati, David J Cohen, Jai Radhakrishnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition has been shown to slow progression of chronic allograft nephropathy in animal models, no studies have examined its efficacy in humans.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients with biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy who had > or =6 months dialysis-free follow-up at our institution. A total of 32 patients treated for > or =6 consecutive months with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and/or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) therapy (group 1) were compared with 31 patients not on these agents (group 2).
RESULTS: Except for a higher incidence of hypertension (100 vs. 78%, P=0.005) in group 1, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics at time of biopsy. With a mean follow-up time of 27 months in both groups, 6 of 32 (19%) group 1 patients vs. 12 of 31 (39%) group 2 reached the primary endpoint of > or =50% increase in serum creatinine (P=0.10). Mean time to primary endpoint was 46.6 months in group 1 vs. 32.7 months in group 2 (P=0.07). Three of 32 (9%) of group 1 patients vs. 8 of 31 (26%) of group 2 returned to dialysis during this time (P=0.11). Significantly fewer patients in group 1 reached the combined secondary endpoint of allograft failure or death (9.4 vs. 35.5%, P=0.01); in addition, group 1 had a longer mean time to this endpoint (51.2 vs. 37.6 months, P=0.03). On multivariate analysis, the only predictor of progression to primary endpoint was a high baseline serum creatinine (P=0.02). No significant differences in hyperkalemia or anemia were found between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition/angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy is well tolerated in renal allograft recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy. It is associated with a trend of slowing renal insufficiency as well as a significant survival benefit in the combined endpoint of allograft failure or death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11907428     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200203150-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is RAS blockade routinely indicated in hypertensive kidney transplant patients?

Authors:  Daniel J Salzberg
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in renal transplantation between 1990 and 2002 in Spain.

Authors:  Angel Alonso Hernández; Francesc Moreso; Beatriz Bayés; Ricardo Lauzurica; Dámaso Sánz-Guajardo; Ernesto Gómez-Huertas; Porfirio Pereira; Javier Paul; Josep Crespo; Juan J Amenábar; Juan Oliver; Daniel Serón
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  The pathogenesis and treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Authors:  Can Li; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Novel options for failing allograft in kidney transplanted patients to avoid or defer dialysis therapy.

Authors:  Ekamol Tantisattamo; Ramy M Hanna; Uttam G Reddy; Hirohito Ichii; Donald C Dafoe; Gabriel M Danovitch; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  Chronic kidney disease after liver, cardiac, lung, heart-lung, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Sangeeta Hingorani
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.714

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.