OBJECTIVES: To use two rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests at labor, measure test acceptance and performance, and measure HIV prevalence in these women. METHODS: Between February and October 2000, two rapid tests (Determine; Abbott, Chicago, IL, U.S.A. and Double Check; Orgenics, Yavne, Israel) were used in three public maternities in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot (WB) analysis confirmed positive and discordant results. RESULTS: Of the 858 patients who were enrolled, the mean gestational age was 36 weeks (median = 39, mode = 40) and 17 (2%) refused testing. Of the 841 patients tested, 13 were positive by both tests, which represents a 1.5% prevalence (95% confidence interval: 0.7%-2.3%); all were confirmed by ELISA and WB analysis. Seven samples gave discordant results by the rapid tests; of these, six were ELISA-negative/WB-negative and one was ELISA-negative/WB-indeterminate. The positive predictive value for samples that were positive by both rapid tests simultaneously was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Two rapid HIV tests used at labor were well accepted (98%). When the combined results of the two rapid tests (but not a single rapid test) were analyzed, this strategy was as efficient as the standard ELISA and WB HIV strategy for correctly classifying individuals.
OBJECTIVES: To use two rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests at labor, measure test acceptance and performance, and measure HIV prevalence in these women. METHODS: Between February and October 2000, two rapid tests (Determine; Abbott, Chicago, IL, U.S.A. and Double Check; Orgenics, Yavne, Israel) were used in three public maternities in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot (WB) analysis confirmed positive and discordant results. RESULTS: Of the 858 patients who were enrolled, the mean gestational age was 36 weeks (median = 39, mode = 40) and 17 (2%) refused testing. Of the 841 patients tested, 13 were positive by both tests, which represents a 1.5% prevalence (95% confidence interval: 0.7%-2.3%); all were confirmed by ELISA and WB analysis. Seven samples gave discordant results by the rapid tests; of these, six were ELISA-negative/WB-negative and one was ELISA-negative/WB-indeterminate. The positive predictive value for samples that were positive by both rapid tests simultaneously was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Two rapid HIV tests used at labor were well accepted (98%). When the combined results of the two rapid tests (but not a single rapid test) were analyzed, this strategy was as efficient as the standard ELISA and WB HIV strategy for correctly classifying individuals.
Authors: Max Q Arens; Linda M Mundy; Daniel Amsterdam; J Tom Barrett; Dan Bigg; David Bruckner; Bruce Hanna; Harry Prince; Timothy Purington; Todd Hanna; Ross Hewitt; Carolyn Kalinka; Thomas Koppes; Sarz Maxwell; Ardis Moe; Mehmet Doymaz; Melinda Poulter; Maryam Saber-Tehrani; Lorenzo Simard; Donna Wilkins-Carmody; John Vidaver; Cheryl Berger; Alan H Davis; Mortimer T Alzona Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Bharat S Parekh; Chin-Yih Ou; Peter N Fonjungo; Mireille B Kalou; Erin Rottinghaus; Adrian Puren; Heather Alexander; Mackenzie Hurlston Cox; John N Nkengasong Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Didier K Ekouevi; Benjamin G Kariyiare; Patrick A Coffie; Marthe-Aline Jutand; Koffi Akpadza; Annette Lawson-Evi; Albert Tatagan; François Dabis; Mathieu Sibe; Vincent P Pitche; Renaud Becquet; Mireille David Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2012 Impact factor: 5.396