Literature DB >> 11906979

Preferences for gender of family physician among Canadian European-descent and South-Asian immigrant women.

Farah Ahmad1, Hansa Gupta, Jenna Rawlins, Donna E Stewart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate expressed preferences for family physician (FP) gender among Canadian European-descent (CED) and Canadian South-Asian (CSA) immigrant women.
METHOD: An 'on-site' survey was conducted in community-based institutions in Toronto in order to determine preferences for the gender of FP under various health care scenarios: overall health care; gender-sensitive examinations; emotional problems; general ailments; and life-threatening conditions.
RESULTS: Ninety-four women responded to this survey (CED = 50, CSA = 44), response rate 77.3%. For all health care scenarios, CED and CSA women similarly expressed either a preference for a female FP or no preference. More than two-thirds of women preferred a female FP for gynaecological examinations (CED, 72.9%; CSA, 83.7%) or examinations with private body part exposure (CED, 72%; CSA, 81.8%). For 'emotional problems', half of the women preferred a female FP and the other half had no preference. A similar pattern was observed for 'overall health care', with some shift to female physician preference among CSA women (60.5%) compared with CED women (53.2%). For the 'overall health care' scenario, CED and CSA women who preferred a female FP had a higher frequency of seeing female physicians within the last 5 years (CED, P < or = 0.01; CSA, P < or = 0.05), and attributed 'positive' social skills more to female physicians (CED, P < or = 0.01; CSA, P < or = 0.01) compared with women with no preference for the gender of the FP. Yet, CED women with a female FP preference were more likely to have a concurrent female FP (P < or = 0.01), and to rate past experiences with female physicians as high (P < or = 0.01) and with male physicians as low (P < or = 0.05) compared with CED women with no preference. In the CSA group, women with a preference for a female FP were more likely to be unemployed (P < or = 0.01) and have low social support (P < or = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar physician gender preference patterns, factors associated with these preferences show some differences between CED and CSA women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11906979     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.2.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  14 in total

1.  Primary Health Care Consumers' Acceptance, Trust and Gender Preferences towards Omani Doctors.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Mandhary; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Mustafa Afifi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2007-10

2.  [Patient preferences in primary care].

Authors:  Antonio Luis Aguilar-Shea; Alejandro López Neyra; Javier Aranda Hernández; Sergio Vaño-Galván
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Chinese-Australian women's knowledge, facilitators and barriers related to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cannas Kwok; Kate White; Jessica K Roydhouse
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-12

4.  Women in Free Clinics: An Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life for Prevention and Health Education.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Kyl Myers; Jeanie Ashby; Ha Ngoc Trinh; Maziar M Nourian; Justine J Reel
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-08

5.  A word-of-mouth perspective on consumers of family medicine services: a case study.

Authors:  Traian Soare; Ciprian Ianovici; Iuliana-Raluca Gheorghe; Victor Lorin Purcărea; Cristina Maria Soare
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-05

6.  The influence of practitioner nationality, experience, and sex in shaping patient preferences for dentists.

Authors:  Viren Swami; Alastair McClelland; Raman Bedi; Adrian Furnham
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.607

7.  Israeli Druze women's sex preferences when choosing obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Jonia Amer-Alshiek; Tahani Alshiek; Yifat Amir Levy; Foad Azem; Ami Amit; Hadar Amir
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 8.  Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of South Asians to health research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Teo Aw Quay; Leora Frimer; Patricia A Janssen; Yvonne Lamers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.908

10.  Comparison of treatment outcomes in neck pain patients depending on the sex of the chiropractor: a prospective outcome study.

Authors:  Janine Thöni; Cynthia K Peterson; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.