Literature DB >> 11906683

Tobacco smoking increases gating of irrelevant and enhances attention to relevant tones.

Edward F Domino1, Takuzo Kishimoto.   

Abstract

Ten adult non-smokers and 10 tobacco smokers of mixed gender were studied. The non-smokers were asked to avoid secondhand smoke; the tobacco smokers were asked to abstain from tobacco products for 6-15 h before one abstinent session and to maintain their usual smoking behavior before one smoking session. All subjects were studied twice about 1 week apart in a counterbalanced design. The tobacco smokers smoked their own brand of cigarettes in the smoking session. Auditory event-related potential recordings were begun shortly after the last puff in the smoking session. The potential recordings were repeated three times. The non-smokers had no significant change in their late and long-latency auditory evoked potentials except that about 1 week later the P2 response to irrelevant tones was slightly enhanced. During tobacco abstinence, the P2 amplitude of the smokers was similar to that of the non-smokers, but was diminished after tobacco smoking. During tobacco abstinence, the P3 amplitude to relevant tones was decreased. After smoking, it was increased to that of non-smokers. Tobacco smoking also decreased the amplitude of the P2 response to frequent tones. The data support the hypothesis that tobacco smoking enhances the "protective shield" or "stimulus barrier" to irrelevant and increases attention to relevant auditory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11906683     DOI: 10.1080/14622200110098400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  10 in total

Review 1.  Nicotine and hippocampus-dependent learning: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Nicotine deprivation influences P300 markers of cognitive control.

Authors:  David E Evans; Nathan D Maxfield; Kate Janse Van Rensburg; Jason A Oliver; Kade G Jentink; David J Drobes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Mouse model predicts effects of smoking and varenicline on event-related potentials in humans.

Authors:  Noam D Rudnick; Andrew A Strasser; Jennifer M Phillips; Christopher Jepson; Freda Patterson; Joseph M Frey; Bruce I Turetsky; Caryn Lerman; Steven J Siegel
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor stimulation contributes to the effects of nicotine in the DBA/2 mouse model of sensory gating.

Authors:  Richard J Radek; Holly M Miner; Natalie A Bratcher; Michael W Decker; Murali Gopalakrishnan; Robert S Bitner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  APOE genotype influences P3b amplitude and response to smoking abstinence in young adults.

Authors:  Ryan Coppens; Norka E Rabinovich; Raghuveer Kanneganti; Herman A Diggs; Kristin Wiggs; Travis Healey; Jodi Huggenvik; Gregory M Rose; David G Gilbert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  M1 muscarinic receptor for the development of auditory cortical function.

Authors:  Karalee K Shideler; Jun Yan
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.041

Review 7.  Recent EEG and ERP findings in substance abusers.

Authors:  Natalie A Ceballos; Lance O Bauer; Rebecca J Houston
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Nicotine withdrawal disrupts both foreground and background contextual fear conditioning but not pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Jessica M André; Danielle Gulick; George S Portugal; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The effects of nicotine on the attentional modification of the acoustic startle response in nonsmokers.

Authors:  Joseph S Baschnagel; Larry W Hawk
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Nicotinic modulation of tone-evoked responses in auditory cortex reflects the strength of prior auditory learning.

Authors:  Kevin Liang; Bonnie Sue Poytress; Norman M Weinberger; Raju Metherate
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.877

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.