AIMS: To evaluate the reliability and criterion validity of a food intake questionnaire (FIQ) designed for use in schoolchildren. METHODS: Study of reliability: 98 young people aged 13-14 years attending two schools in deprived areas of Liverpool completed the FIQ on three separate occasions over a 3-month period. VALIDITY STUDY: Ninety-six young people (aged 11-13 years) completed the FIQ and 2 weeks later completed a 3-day food diary (with interview). RESULTS: The FIQ gave consistent response on separate occasions over the 3-month reliability study period. Levels of agreement were consistent between survey combinations. Analysis of variance showed no differences in mean score for food groups between surveys. Pearson correlations for mean scores estimated by separate FIQ ranged from 0.42 for fibre food group to 0.76 for negative marker food group; the majority of the correlations were above 0.5. The data suggested the FIQ should be able to detect a change of +/-10% in eating habits. The validity study provided modest but significant Pearson correlations between energy intake, fat intake as a percentage of energy intake and sugars intake derived from 3-day diaries, and mean scores for the fatty, sugary and negative marker food group assessed by the FIQ. CONCLUSIONS: The results from both studies provide an indication of the FIQ's reliability, and suggest it has criterion validity for fatty and sugary and negative marker foods.
AIMS: To evaluate the reliability and criterion validity of a food intake questionnaire (FIQ) designed for use in schoolchildren. METHODS: Study of reliability: 98 young people aged 13-14 years attending two schools in deprived areas of Liverpool completed the FIQ on three separate occasions over a 3-month period. VALIDITY STUDY: Ninety-six young people (aged 11-13 years) completed the FIQ and 2 weeks later completed a 3-day food diary (with interview). RESULTS: The FIQ gave consistent response on separate occasions over the 3-month reliability study period. Levels of agreement were consistent between survey combinations. Analysis of variance showed no differences in mean score for food groups between surveys. Pearson correlations for mean scores estimated by separate FIQ ranged from 0.42 for fibre food group to 0.76 for negative marker food group; the majority of the correlations were above 0.5. The data suggested the FIQ should be able to detect a change of +/-10% in eating habits. The validity study provided modest but significant Pearson correlations between energy intake, fat intake as a percentage of energy intake and sugars intake derived from 3-day diaries, and mean scores for the fatty, sugary and negative marker food group assessed by the FIQ. CONCLUSIONS: The results from both studies provide an indication of the FIQ's reliability, and suggest it has criterion validity for fatty and sugary and negative marker foods.
Authors: Donald A Williamson; Catherine M Champagne; David Harsha; Hongmei Han; Corby K Martin; Robert Newton; Tiffany M Stewart; Donna H Ryan Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jenny Lloyd; Siobhan Creanor; Stuart Logan; Colin Green; Sarah G Dean; Melvyn Hillsdon; Charles Abraham; Richard Tomlinson; Virginia Pearson; Rod S Taylor; Emma Ryan; Lisa Price; Adam Streeter; Katrina Wyatt Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2018-01
Authors: Stuart J Fairclough; Allan F Hackett; Ian G Davies; Rebecca Gobbi; Kelly A Mackintosh; Genevieve L Warburton; Gareth Stratton; Esther M F van Sluijs; Lynne M Boddy Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Katrina M Wyatt; Jennifer J Lloyd; Charles Abraham; Siobhan Creanor; Sarah Dean; Emma Densham; Wendy Daurge; Colin Green; Melvyn Hillsdon; Virginia Pearson; Rod S Taylor; Richard Tomlinson; Stuart Logan Journal: Trials Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 2.279