Literature DB >> 11904689

Oblique radiograph for the detection of bone spurs in anterior ankle impingement.

C Niek van Dijk1, Ronald N Wessel, Johannes L Tol, M Maas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a radiographic view to detect anteromedial talotibial osteophytes that remain undetected on standard radiographs. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In 10 cadaver specimens the maximal size was measured of anteromedial tibial osteophytes that remain undetected on a standard lateral radiograph projection, due to the presence of the anteromedial tibial rim. The average projection of the most prominent anterolateral tibial rim over the anteromedial rim was found to be 7.3 mm. A 7 mm barium-clay osteophyte was attached to this anteromedial rim of the distal tibia. Anteromedial osteophytes become most prominent on an oblique view, in which the radiographic beam is tilted into a 45 degrees craniocaudal direction with the leg in 30 degrees external rotation. This oblique view was compared with the findings of arthroscopic surgery in 25 consecutive patients with anterior ankle impingement syndrome.
RESULTS: Medially located tibial and talar osteophytes remained undetected on a standard lateral projection and became visible on the oblique anteromedial impingement (AMI) radiograph. Anterolateral tibial and talar osteophytes were well detected on a standard lateral radiograph projection but were invisible on the AMI view. There was a high correlation between the location of the osteophyte and the location of symptoms and the findings at arthroscopy.
CONCLUSION: A combination of lateral and oblique radiographs can be used to differentiate between anteromedial and anterolateral bony ankle impingement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11904689     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-002-0477-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  Update on anterior ankle impingement.

Authors:  Tanawat Vaseenon; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Raymond J Walls; Keir A Ross; Ethan J Fraser; Christopher W Hodgkins; Niall A Smyth; Christopher J Egan; James Calder; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

3.  [Knee and ankle injuries from playing football].

Authors:  J Kramer; G Scheurecker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Ankle impingement syndromes: an imaging review.

Authors:  Zachary Berman; Monica Tafur; Sonya S Ahmed; Brady K Huang; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  US in ankle impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lionel Pesquer; Stephane Guillo; Philippe Meyer; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-26

6.  Comparative analysis of arthroscopic debridement in osseous versus soft tissue anterior ankle impingement.

Authors:  Ashish Devgan; Rajesh Rohilla; Milind Tanwar; Aditya Jain; Karan Siwach; Radika Devgan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-04-20

7.  Surfers ankle: a bony spur of the talar neck.

Authors:  Francis Michael Brooks; Paul Williams; E C Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-06-26

Review 8.  Persistent ankle pain following a sprain: a review of imaging.

Authors:  Ramy Mansour; Zaid Jibri; Sridhar Kamath; Kausik Mukherjee; Simon Ostlere
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-03-05

9.  Medial impingement of the ankle in athletes.

Authors:  Arthur Manoli
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  "Web impingement" of the ankle: a case report.

Authors:  Kars P Valkering; Pau Golanó; C Niek van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.