Literature DB >> 11904603

How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth?

Hong Yang1, Michael S Kramer, Robert W Platt, Béatrice Blondel, Gérard Bréart, Isabelle Morin, Russell Wilkins, Robert Usher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early ultrasound scanning estimation of gestational age is known to increase the reported preterm delivery rate (<37 completed weeks) compared with estimation by date of the last normal menstrual period, but it is unclear how this systematic difference arises. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was a hospital-based study of 44,623 women who delivered a live-born or stillborn infant between January 1, 1978, and March 31, 1996, and who had both last normal menstrual period-based and early (usually at 16-18 weeks) ultrasound scan-based gestational age estimates. Cross-classification of the 2 estimates by completed weeks was used to examine the direction and magnitude of the differences between them and to compare the resulting classifications of preterm birth.
RESULTS: The early ultrasound scan-based gestational age distribution was shifted uniformly to the left (ie, lower gestational age) relative to the last normal menstrual period gestational age distribution; the early ultrasound scan-based preterm delivery rate was 9.1%, which was 19.5% (n = 659 births) higher than the 7.6% rate by last normal menstrual period (P <.0001). The last normal menstrual period estimate exceeded the early ultrasound scan estimate far more often than the reverse, up to and including early ultrasound scan estimates of 40 weeks. No concentration of 4-week discrepancies was observed in either direction, as would be expected with random or systematic errors in recall of the last normal menstrual period. The absolute number of births at 37 to 39 weeks of gestation (by last normal menstrual period) that were reclassified as preterm (n = 1206 births) was much higher than the number of preterm births at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation that were reclassified as term (n = 581 births). The net increase of 625 preterm births (from 581 to 1206 births) that resulted from reclassification of births at 37 to 39 last normal menstrual period weeks accounted for 95% of the total 659-birth increase in early ultrasound scan-based preterm births at all last normal menstrual period gestational ages.
CONCLUSION: Early ultrasound scanning reduces the gestational age estimate across the entire gestational age range; early ultrasound scan-based reclassification of gestational age results in a substantial increase in the prevalence of preterm births. Small downward reclassifications exceed upward reclassifications of similar magnitude, which is consistent with previous reports that delayed (>14 days) ovulation is more frequent than early (<14 days) ovulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11904603     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.120487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  29 in total

1.  Development and testing of interview questions to determine last menstrual period in Mexican immigrant populations.

Authors:  Natalia Deeb-Sossa; Robert P Agans; Betzabe C Butron-Riveros; Hector Balcazar; William D Kalsbeek; Pierre Buekens
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2004-07

2.  Francophone and Anglophone perinatal health: temporal and regional inequalities in a Canadian setting, 1981-2008.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Alison L Park; Sam Harper
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

4.  Shortening of gestational length among native-born and immigrants in Spain (1997-2008).

Authors:  Adela Castelló; Isabel Río; María Sandín-Vázquez; Francisco Bolúmar
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Should gestational weight gain recommendations be tailored by maternal characteristics?

Authors:  Lisa M Bodnar; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Robert W Platt; Katherine P Himes; Hyagriv N Simhan; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Maternal anemia in Benin: prevalence, risk factors, and association with low birth weight.

Authors:  Florence Bodeau-Livinec; Valerie Briand; Jacques Berger; Xu Xiong; Achille Massougbodji; Karen P Day; Michel Cot
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study.

Authors:  Jens Langhoff-Roos; Ulrik Kesmodel; Bo Jacobsson; Steen Rasmussen; Ida Vogel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-23

8.  Are black and Hispanic infants with specific congenital heart defects at increased risk of preterm birth?

Authors:  Wendy N Nembhard; Jason L Salemi; Melissa L Loscalzo; Tao Wang; Kimberlea W Hauser
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Contribution of maternal age to preterm birth rates in Denmark and Quebec, 1981-2008.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Anne V Hansen; Laust Mortensen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Accuracy of emergency physician performed bedside ultrasound in determining gestational age in first trimester pregnancy.

Authors:  Turandot Saul; Resa E Lewiss; Marina Del Rios Rivera
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2012-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.