Literature DB >> 11902356

Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings.

Cees Lucas1, Jody Classen, Deannine Harrison, HaanRobJ De.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: An essential element in pressure ulcer management is the assessment of wound healing through measurement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measuring pressure ulcers using instant full-scale photography combined with transparency tracings.
SUBJECTS: 26 patients in 3 long-term-care facilities.
METHODS: Duplicate photographs of 30 wounds from 26 subjects were obtained once a week over a period of 2 weeks, resulting in 120 photographs. Duplicate tracings of the photographs were subsequently assessed by 2 independent observers, resulting in 480 observations. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used as an indicator of chance-corrected agreement to estimate the relative reliability for the interobserver and intraobserver data. An Altman-Bland plot was also constructed to measure the relationship between interobserver differences and wound surface area.
RESULTS: Analysis of the data showed that all measurement comparisons were highly reliable (ICCs = 0.99). No statistical differences between observed surface areas could be demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined wound measurement method described in this study represents a simple, practical, and inexpensive technique to accurately monitor and evaluate pressure ulcer healing. An instant full-scale photographic technique combined with transparency tracings of a wound should be considered for wound measurement, rather than each technique used independently. The results of this study indicate that measurements obtained with this combined method are highly reliable within and between observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11902356     DOI: 10.1097/00129334-200201000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care        ISSN: 1527-7941            Impact factor:   2.347


  5 in total

1.  Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model.

Authors:  Theodore J Cios; Kevin M Reavis; David R Renton; Jeffrey W Hazey; Dean J Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Matthew T Allemang; S Scott Davis; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A comparison of wound area measurement techniques: visitrak versus photography.

Authors:  Angela Christine Chang; Bronwyn Dearman; John Edward Greenwood
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-04-18

3.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of negative pressure wound therapy to treat grade III/IV pressure ulcers [ISRCTN69032034].

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Elizabeth McGinnis; Nikki Stubbs; David J Torgerson; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Comparison of healing rate in diabetes-related foot ulcers with low frequency ultrasonic debridement versus non-surgical sharps debridement: a randomised trial protocol.

Authors:  Lucia Michailidis; Cylie M Williams; Shan M Bergin; Terry P Haines
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  mHealth App for Pressure Ulcer Wound Assessment in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Validation Study.

Authors:  Ariane Do Khac; Claire Jourdan; Sylvain Fazilleau; Claire Palayer; Isabelle Laffont; Arnaud Dupeyron; Stéphane Verdun; Anthony Gelis
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.