Literature DB >> 11902025

The development and demise of a cataract surgery database.

Flora Lum1, Andrew P Schachat, Henry D Jampel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO; San Francisco) launched a national eye care outcomes initiative in 1996, in response to strong interest by third-party payers and managed care in performance measurement and outcomes. The AAO's outcomes initiative NEON (National Eyecare Outcomes Network) began with the design and launch of a prospective observational registry of patients undergoing cataract surgery.
METHODS: Participants submitted a common set of data regarding patients' demographics, preoperative ophthalmologic history, physical exam, test results, functional status and symptoms, intraoperative procedures and events, and postoperative outcomes for all patients undergoing first or second eye cataract surgery.
RESULTS: Between January 1, 1996, and March 30, 2001, a total of 249 ophthalmologists submitted data on 17,876 patients undergoing first or second eye surgery. All preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data forms were submitted for 9,937 patients (55.7%). After surgery, 93% of patients achieved a best corrected visual acuity of 20/40, 89% improved their visual functioning, and 92% experienced fewer cataract-related symptoms. DISCUSSION: At the end of March 2001, NEON was discontinued because of a lack of participation and demand by members or third parties for this information. The momentum for accountability and performance measures never quite materialized into advantages for contracting for physicians or requirements by payers. In the future, more scientific evidence regarding the validity and meaning of outcome measures and differences in measurements, investment in health information technology infrastructure, use of technology to collect information at the point of care, and incentives favoring data collection and analysis will be needed to pave the way for renewed interest in outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11902025     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28010-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  8 in total

Review 1.  [The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives. German Version].

Authors:  D W Parke Ii; F Lum; W L Rich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Internet-Based Multi-institutional Clinical Research: A New Method to Conduct and Manage Quality of Life Studies.

Authors:  Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

Review 3.  The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives.

Authors:  D W Parke Ii; F Lum; W L Rich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  NIS vs SAGES: a comparison of national and voluntary databases.

Authors:  J M Morton; J A Galanko; N J Soper; D E Low; J Hunter; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  The application of clinical registries in ophthalmic trauma-the International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiology Study (IGATES).

Authors:  Sean Ming Sheng Ng; Rebecca Low; Annette K Hoskin; Andres Rousselot; Dinesh Visva Gunasekeran; Sundaram Natarajan; Gangadhara Sundar; Caroline Ka Lin Chee; Chitaranjan Mishra; Parveen Sen; Eli Pradhan; Yunia Irawati; Tengku Ain Kamalden; Mehul Shah; Hua Yan; Fasika A Woreta; Prem S Subramanian; Ferenc Kuhn; Stephanie L Watson; Rupesh Agrawal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  [Current situation of electronic medical records in ophthalmological departments in Germany].

Authors:  L Fuhrmann; D Böhringer; P Gass; C Dicke; N Eter; M Schargus
Journal:  Ophthalmologie       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  Multi-stakeholder perspectives in defining health services quality indicators and dimensions: a concept mapping based comparison for cataract care between Singapore and The Netherlands.

Authors:  Aline Stolk-Vos; Dirk De Korne; Ecosse Lamoureux; Charity Wai; Jan Jv Busschbach; Joel Joris van de Klundert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Design, development and deployment of a web-based interoperable registry for inherited retinal dystrophies in Portugal: the IRD-PT.

Authors:  João Pedro Marques; Ana Luísa Carvalho; José Henriques; Joaquim Neto Murta; Jorge Saraiva; Rufino Silva
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.123

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.