Literature DB >> 11901006

Influence of imaging parameters on high-intensity cerebrospinal fluid artifacts in fast-FLAIR MR imaging.

Hsiu-Mei Wu1, David M Yousem, Hsiao-Wen Chung, Wan-Yuo Guo, Cheng-Yen Chang, Cheng-Yu Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: High-intensity CSF artifacts at the basal cisterns on MR images are often seen when a fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) technique is used. We investigated the influences of four optional fast-FLAIR sequence parameters on the high-intensity CSF artifacts.
METHODS: A total of 377 patients (age range, 1 week to 91 years; mean 40.6 years; 186 female, 191 male) were examined with axial fast-FLAIR images obtained (TR/TE(eff)/TI, 8800/133/2200) with a 1.5-T system during 6 months. The effects of the optional addition of inferior inflow saturation (thickness, 80 mm), section flow compensation, and tailored radiofrequency (TRF) pulses, plus the choice of interleaving acquisition factors of 2 or 3, were evaluated for the presence of high-intensity CSF artifacts on the fast-FLAIR images. Two radiologists independently reviewed the fast-FLAIR images in 76 patients; afterward, a single observer reviewed the remainder of the images.
RESULTS: The interobserver agreement rate in 76 cases was more than 90%. The use of TRF and/or three interleaving acquisitions resulted in a substantial reduction in the incidence of high-intensity CSF artifacts from about 80% to 40% (P <.05, two-sample two-sided Z test). Inferior inflow saturation and section flow compensation did not significantly improve image quality (P >.05). The results were consistent with the image quality ranking obtained in five healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSION: The appropriate choice of sequence parameters in fast-FLAIR imaging reduces the incidence of high-intensity CSF artifacts that are frequently encountered in the presence of rapid CSF flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11901006      PMCID: PMC7975292     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  28 in total

1.  Reduction of CSF artifacts on FLAIR images by using adiabatic inversion pulses.

Authors:  J V Hajnal; A Oatridge; A H Herlihy; G M Bydder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Clinical usefulness of T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging of the CNS.

Authors:  J G Adams; E R Melhem
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Applicability and advantages of flow artifact-insensitive fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR sequences for imaging the posterior fossa.

Authors:  N Tanaka; T Abe; K Kojima; H Nishimura; N Hayabuchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradients.

Authors:  E M Haacke; G W Lenz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Stabilization of echo amplitudes in FSE sequences.

Authors:  P Le Roux; R S Hinks
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Intracerebral hemorrhage remote from the site of the initial neurosurgical procedure.

Authors:  S Waga; S Shimosaka; M Sakakura
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Reduction of CSF and blood flow artifacts on FLAIR images of the brain with k-space reordered by inversion time at each slice position (KRISP).

Authors:  A H Herlihy; J V Hajnal; W L Curati; N Virji; A Oatridge; B K Puri; G M Bydder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: MR imaging with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery pulse sequences.

Authors:  K Noguchi; T Ogawa; A Inugami; H Toyoshima; S Sugawara; J Hatazawa; H Fujita; E Shimosegawa; I Kanno; T Okudera
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Subarachnoid space disease: diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging and comparison with gadolinium-enhanced spin-echo MR imaging--blinded reader study.

Authors:  M B Singer; S W Atlas; B P Drayer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging.

Authors:  W G Bradley; D Scalzo; J Queralt; W N Nitz; D J Atkinson; P Wong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Tokiko Koshikawa; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisashi Kawai; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki; Tomomi Komada; Katsuya Maruyama; Osamu Takizawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  FLAIR diffusion-tensor MR tractography: comparison of fiber tracking with conventional imaging.

Authors:  Ming-Chung Chou; Yi-Ru Lin; Teng-Yi Huang; Chao-Ying Wang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Chun-Jung Juan; Cheng-Yu Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Rainald Bachmann; Ralf Reilmann; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel; Stefan Krämer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging: reduced CSF artifacts and enhanced sensitivity and specificity for subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  N Lummel; V Schoepf; M Burke; H Brueckmann; J Linn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Reduction of Oxygen-Induced CSF Hyperintensity on FLAIR MR Images in Sedated Children: Usefulness of Magnetization-Prepared FLAIR Imaging.

Authors:  H-K Jeong; S W Oh; J Kim; S-K Lee; S J Ahn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Artifact simulating subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage on single-shot, fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images caused by head movement: A trap for the unwary.

Authors:  A Cianfoni; M G M Martin; J Du; J R Hesselink; S G Imbesi; W G Bradley; G M Bydder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging and subarachnoid hemorrhage: not a panacea.

Authors:  Mona Mohamed; D Cressler Heasly; Banu Yagmurlu; David M Yousem; D Cressler Heasely
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid flow patterns using the time-spatial labeling inversion pulse technique with 3T MRI: early clinical experiences.

Authors:  Kayoko Abe; Yuko Ono; Hiroko Yoneyama; Yu Nishina; Yasuo Aihara; Yoshikazu Okada; Shuji Sakai
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2014-06-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.