Literature DB >> 11900998

Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging of gliomatosis cerebri.

Stanley Yang1, Stephan Wetzel, M Law, D Zagzag, Soonmee Cha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: MR imaging characteristics of gliomatosis cerebri reiterate the diffuse nature of this tumor but are nonspecific and thus may pose a diagnostic challenge. Because perfusion MR imaging can provide a physiologic map of the microcirculation, we compared the measured relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) at perfusion imaging with histopathologic findings in gliomatosis cerebri. MR spectroscopic findings were also reviewed.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of conventional and perfusion MR images from seven patients with proved gliomatosis cerebri. The conventional MR images were evaluated for the presence or absence of contrast enhancement, necrosis, and extent of T2-weighted signal intensity abnormality. Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted gradient-echo echo-planar images were acquired during the first pass of a bolus injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The rCBV was calculated by using nondiffusible tracer kinetics and expressed relative to normal-appearing white matter. Pathologic findings were reviewed in all patients and compared with the MR perfusion data. Multivoxel 2D chemical shift imaging proton MR spectroscopic data were available for three patients and single-voxel data for one patient.
RESULTS: Conventional MR images showed diffuse abnormality in all cases and absence of contrast enhancement in all but one case. Average rCBV range was 0.75-1.26 (mean, 1.02 +/- 0.42 [SD]). MR spectroscopic data revealed spectra consistent with presence of tumoral disease. Histopathologic review showed absence of vascular hyperplasia in all specimens.
CONCLUSION: The low MR rCBV measurements of gliomatosis cerebri are in concordance with the lack of vascular hyperplasia found at histopathologic examination; thus, perfusion MR imaging provides useful adjunctive information that is not available from conventional MR imaging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11900998      PMCID: PMC7975284     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  Gadopentetate-dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of gliomatosis cerebri: appearance mimicking leptomeningeal tumor dissemination.

Authors:  D J Rippe; O B Boyko; G N Fuller; H S Friedman; W J Oakes; S C Schold
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Difficulties in the antemortem diagnosis of gliomatosis cerebri: report of a case with diffuse increase of gemistocyte-like cells, mimicking reactive gliosis.

Authors:  H Nishioka; H Ito; T Miki
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  Gliomatosis cerebri--an appropriate diagnosis? Case reports.

Authors:  E Fallentin; E Skriver; M Herning; H Broholm
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  MR and positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose F 18 in gliomatosis cerebri.

Authors:  M A Dexter; G D Parker; M Besser; J Ell; M J Fulham
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The incidence of multifocal cerebral gliomas. A histologic study of large hemisphere sections.

Authors:  R O Barnard; J F Geddes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Gliomatosis cerebri with secondary glioblastoma formation: report of two cases.

Authors:  S Kannuki; T Hirose; H Horiguchi; T Kageji; S Nagahiro
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  Gliomatosis cerebri with formation of a glioblastoma multiform. Study and follow-up by magnetic resonance and computed tomography.

Authors:  F J Romero; A Ortega; F Titus; B Ibarra; C Navarro; M Rovira
Journal:  J Comput Tomogr       Date:  1988-10

8.  MR spectroscopy in gliomatosis cerebri.

Authors:  M Bendszus; M Warmuth-Metz; R Klein; R Burger; C Schichor; J C Tonn; L Solymosi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging determination of gliomatosis cerebri.

Authors:  M V Spagnoli; R I Grossman; R J Packer; D B Hackney; H I Goldberg; R A Zimmerman; L T Bilaniuk
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Gliomatosis cerebri: clinical features, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  D G Kim; H J Yang; I A Park; J G Chi; H W Jung; D H Han; K S Choi; B K Cho
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gliomatosis cerebri: a review.

Authors:  Roberta Rudà; Luca Bertero; Marc Sanson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Proton MR spectroscopy of gliomatosis cerebri: case report of elevated myoinositol with normal choline levels.

Authors:  Efrat Saraf-Lavi; Brian C Bowen; Pradip M Pattany; Evelyn M L Sklar; James B Murdoch; Carol K Petito
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Role of diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging for brain tumour characterisation.

Authors:  L Rizzo; S Greco Crasto; P Garcia Moruno; P Cassoni; R Rudà; R Boccaletti; M Brosio; R De Lucchi; C Fava
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Gliomatosis Cerebri: Current Understanding and Controversies.

Authors:  Surabhi Ranjan; Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.