Literature DB >> 11900059

Comparative evaluation of a commercial test for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

R Jureen1, K L Bottolfsen, H Grewal, A Digranes.   

Abstract

The performance and ease of use of the recently introduced MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Japan) for the identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was evaluated in comparison with the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System (Becton Dickinson Europe, France). A total of 109 strains of S. aureus, consisting of 57 strains of MecA-negative S. aureus and 52 strains of MecA-positive S. aureus, were tested. With MecA PCR as the gold standard, the MRSA screen test had 98% sensitivity and 98% specificity, whereas the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System had 98% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The simplicity of use and rapid result make the MRSA screen test a valuable tool in the clinical microbiology laboratory pending demonstration of the MecA gene that should still always be done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11900059     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2001.d01-147.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  1 in total

1.  Differentiation between Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species by real-time PCR including detection of methicillin resistants in comparison to conventional microbiology testing.

Authors:  Sven Klaschik; Lutz E Lehmann; Folkert Steinhagen; Malte Book; Ernst Molitor; Andreas Hoeft; Frank Stueber
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.