Literature DB >> 11899634

Interrater reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale scoring among nurses in sub-specialties of critical care.

R Heron1, A Davie, R Gillies, M Courtney.   

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is used as an assessment tool to measure the levels of consciousness and coma in patients. This research investigated the reliability of scoring the GCS among registered nurses (RNs) working in five different sub-specialty clinical areas of critical care; general intensive care, neurosurgical intensive care, coronary care, emergency room and post anaesthetic recovery room. Seven video recordings were made of six patients (one patient was recorded twice) having their level of neurological response assessed utilising the GCS. Seventy five RNs (15 from each sub-specialty) viewed each of the GCS assessments on the videotape and rated each patient on the scoring sheet provided. Analysis was performed for all RN subjects as a single group as well as separately for each of the five groups under investigation. The ratings for the first six videos were used to test interrater reliability and the scores from videotape four and seven (same patient) were used to calculate intrarater reliability. Based on comparison with expert scores, of the 75 participants, 38 responded correctly to eye opening responses; only 26 responded correctly to the motor response ratings. However, a better accuracy was achieved in the verbal response category with 67 participants responding correctly. Education qualifications and previous neurosurgical experience were statistically significant with regard to the nurses' accuracy of GCS assessment with p values of 0.004 and 0.043 respectively. The results were consistent with previously published studies demonstrating the motor response rating is most problematic in relation to rate accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11899634     DOI: 10.1016/s1036-7314(01)80026-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Crit Care        ISSN: 1036-7314            Impact factor:   2.737


  3 in total

Review 1.  The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Florence C M Reith; Ruben Van den Brande; Anneliese Synnot; Russell Gruen; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Is there an association between the rating of illness and injury severity and the experience of emergency medical physicians?].

Authors:  J Knapp; M Bernhard; C Hainer; M Sikinger; T Brenner; T Schlechtriemen; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Assessing Nurses Knowledge of Glasgow Coma Scale in Emergency and Outpatient Department.

Authors:  Harvinderjit Kaur A/P Basauhra Singh; Mei Chan Chong; Hari Chandran A/L Thambinayagam; Mohd Idzwan Bin Zakaria; Siew Ting Cheng; Li Yoong Tang; Nurul Hafizan Azahar
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.