Literature DB >> 11898138

Family history of breast cancer. Impact on the disease experience.

A Petrisek1, S Campbell, L Laliberte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Family history is the most prominent risk factor, besides advanced age, for the incidence of breast cancer among women. This study investigates differences in the experiences of women in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of early-stage disease. The purpose of this research is to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of family history on the overall illness experience. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: Self-report retrospective data obtained from in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of 179 women who had recently received a diagnosis of nonrecurrent stage 0 to IIIA breast cancer are used to compare the experiences of women with and without a family history of breast cancer (FHOBC). The authors examine differences in screening behavior, method of detection, diagnostic processes, treatment decision making, and therapy receipt, and they report the results of bivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The results suggest that women with FHOBC have a different disease experience than those without an affected relative. Women with FHOBC were more likely than their counterparts to comply with screening guidelines, to seek more timely care, to consult with specialists, to be influenced by the experiences of others, to feel comfortable with treatment decisions, and to receive adjuvant therapy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers should be aware that compliance with mammography and therapy guidelines may vary with FHOBC. Because the better health-related behavior reported by women with affected relatives suggests that they may have higher perceived risk, physicians should be sensitive to potentially elevated levels of anxiety, provide accurate information about relative risk, put patient concerns in the proper perspective, and include family members in treatment discussions. Alternatively, women without an FHOBC appear to have less favorable screening, detection, diagnosis, and treatment decision-making behavior. Because family doctors play an important role in the care of these patients, they may need to provide special education and counseling regarding the importance of adherence to screening guidelines, recognition of relevant symptoms, initiation of timely examinations, consultation with cancer specialists, and compliance with treatment recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11898138     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.83007.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Pract        ISSN: 1065-4704


  7 in total

1.  Integrating genetic and genomic information into effective cancer care in diverse populations.

Authors:  L Fashoyin-Aje; K Sanghavi; K Bjornard; J Bodurtha
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients.

Authors:  Suzanne S Vang; Alexandra Dunn; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Family history of lung cancer and contemplation of smoking cessation.

Authors:  Chad A Bousman; Lisa Madlensky
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  The relationship between knowledge of family history and cancer characteristics at diagnosis in women newly-diagnosed with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Marijana Lijovic; Susan R Davis; Pam Fradkin; Jo Bradbury; Maria La China; Max Schwarz; Rory Wolfe; Helen Farrugia; Robin J Bell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Cancer Screening Literacy among Vietnamese Population: Does Annual Checkup Improve Cancer Screening Literacy?

Authors:  Sangchul Yoon; Kun Wang; Yan Luo; Jongwook Lee; Jessica Neese; Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 6.  Family History of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Risk between Malays Ethnicity in Malaysia and Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ricvan Dana Nindrea; Teguh Aryandono; Lutfan Lazuardi; Iwan Dwiprahasto
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Risk of breast cancer in the UK biobank female cohort and its relationship to anthropometric and reproductive factors.

Authors:  Kawthar Al-Ajmi; Artitaya Lophatananon; William Ollier; Kenneth R Muir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.