Literature DB >> 11896951

Down-up sequential separation of the placenta.

A Herman1, A Zimerman, S Arieli, Y Tovbin, M Bezer, I Bukovsky, M Panski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the patterns of placental separation during the third stage of labor.
METHODS: Continuous real-time ultrasound was performed during the third stage of labor in 101 normal deliveries. The sequence of placental separation was recorded for determining whether the process was multiphasic, the site from which separation commenced and the mode of its progression.
RESULTS: Separation in 97 cases was multiphasic. Monophasic separation in which all parts of the placenta appeared to separate simultaneously occurred in two cases only. Pathological prolongation of the third stage precluded determination of separation in two cases. Ninety-two cases had a uterine wall placenta (anterior or posterior); the separation commenced at one pole and progressed sequentially towards the opposite side in 89 of them. The process started at the lower pole (down-up separation) in 83/92 cases (90.2%) and began from the upper pole (up-down separation) in only 6/92 cases (6.5%). Nine cases had a fundal placenta; of these the separation was also multiphasic but began sequentially from either the anterior or posterior pole, or simultaneously from both, in 8 (88.9%) cases so that the fundal part was separated last (bipolar separation).
CONCLUSIONS: Placental separation is usually an orderly multiphasic phenomenon that begins mostly from the lower pole of the placenta and propagates sequentially upwards. Fundal placentae, however, separate first at their poles with the fundal part being separated last. Recognition of the sequence of events and understanding of the mechanism of placental separation may aid in detecting cases prone to third-stage complications and in managing pathological ones.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896951     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  5 in total

Review 1.  Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour.

Authors:  Cecily M Begley; Gillian M L Gyte; Declan Devane; William McGuire; Andrew Weeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.

Authors:  Manasi Patwardhan; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse Schwartz; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour.

Authors:  Cecily M Begley; Gillian Ml Gyte; Declan Devane; William McGuire; Andrew Weeks; Linda M Biesty
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-13

4.  Heat shock protein 27 is spatially distributed in the human placenta and decreased during labor.

Authors:  Akrem Abdulsid; Alexander Fletcher; Fiona Lyall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Ki Hoon Ahn; Min-Jeong Oh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-11-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.