Literature DB >> 11896297

Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints.

Wout Slob1.   

Abstract

A family of (nested) dose-response models is introduced herein that can be used for describing the change in any continuous endpoint as a function of dose. A member from this family of models may be selected using the likelihood ratio test as a criterion, to prevent overparameterization. The proposed methodology provides for a formal approach of model selection, and a transparent way of assessing the benchmark dose. Apart from a number of natural constraints, the model expressions follow from an obvious way of quantifying differences in sensitivity between populations. As a consequence, dose-response data that relate to both sexes can be efficiently analyzed by incorporating the data from both sexes in the same analysis, even if the sexes are not equally sensitive to the compound studied. The idea of differences in sensitivity is closely related to the assessment factors used in risk assessment. Thus, the models are directly applicable to estimating such factors, if data concerning populations to be compared are available. Such information is valuable for further validation or adjustment of default assessment factors, as well as for informing distributional assessment factors in a probabilistic risk assessment. The various applications of the proposed methodology are illustrated by real data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896297     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/66.2.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  52 in total

1.  Two-Stage Experimental Design for Dose-Response Modeling in Toxicology Studies.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Feng Yang; Dale W Porter; Nianqiang Wu
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.198

2.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo clastogenic potency based on benchmark dose analysis of flow cytometric micronucleus data.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; John W Wills; Steven M Bryce; Dorothea K Torous; Stephen D Dertinger; Wout Slob
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  The structured core domain of αB-crystallin can prevent amyloid fibrillation and associated toxicity.

Authors:  Georg K A Hochberg; Heath Ecroyd; Cong Liu; Dezerae Cox; Duilio Cascio; Michael R Sawaya; Miranda P Collier; James Stroud; John A Carver; Andrew J Baldwin; Carol V Robinson; David S Eisenberg; Justin L P Benesch; Arthur Laganowsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bayesian Quantile Impairment Threshold Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Endpoints.

Authors:  Matthew W Wheeler; A John Bailer; Tarah Cole; Robert M Park; Kan Shao
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  Estimating the carcinogenic potency of chemicals from the in vivo micronucleus test.

Authors:  Lya G Soeteman-Hernández; George E Johnson; Wout Slob
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Locally Optimal Designs for Some Dose-Response Models With Continuous Endpoints.

Authors:  Yi Zhai; Zhide Fang
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 0.893

8.  Considerations for Strategic Use of High-Throughput Transcriptomics Chemical Screening Data in Regulatory Decisions.

Authors:  Joshua Harrill; Imran Shah; R Woodrow Setzer; Derik Haggard; Scott Auerbach; Richard Judson; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019

9.  Oxidative stress and renal toxicity after subacute exposure to decabrominated diphenyl ether in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Vesna Milovanovic; Aleksandra Buha; Vesna Matovic; Marijana Curcic; Slavica Vucinic; Takeshi Nakano; Biljana Antonijevic
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation.

Authors:  Marie Z Vasquez
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.