Literature DB >> 11896118

Hepatic drug targeting: phase I evaluation of polymer-bound doxorubicin.

Leonard W Seymour1, David R Ferry, David Anderson, Stuart Hesslewood, Peter J Julyan, Richard Poyner, Jayne Doran, Annie M Young, Sally Burtles, David J Kerr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies have shown good anticancer activity following targeting of a polymer bearing doxorubicin with galactosamine (PK2) to the liver. The present phase I study was devised to determine the toxicity, pharmacokinetic profile, and targeting capability of PK2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Doxorubicin was linked via a lysosomally degradable tetrapeptide sequence to N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers bearing galactosamine. Targeting, toxicity, and efficacy were evaluated in 31 patients with primary (n = 25) or metastatic (n = 6) liver cancer. Body distribution of the radiolabelled polymer conjugate was assessed using gamma-camera imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography.
RESULTS: The polymer was administered by intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 1 hour, repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalation proceeded from 20 to 160 mg/m(2) (doxorubicin equivalents), the maximum-tolerated dose, which was associated with severe fatigue, grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 3 mucositis. Twenty-four hours after administration, 16.9% +/- 3.9% of the administered dose of doxorubicin targeted to the liver and 3.3% +/- 5.6% of dose was delivered to tumor. Doxorubicin-polymer conjugate without galactosamine showed no targeting. Three hepatoma patients showed partial responses, with one in continuing partial remission 47 months after therapy.
CONCLUSION: The recommended PK2 dose is 120 mg/m(2), administered every 3 weeks by IV infusion. Liver-specific doxorubicin delivery is achievable using galactosamine-modified polymers, and targeting is also seen in primary hepatocellular tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896118     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  78 in total

Review 1.  Physical and chemical strategies for therapeutic delivery by using polymeric nanoparticles.

Authors:  José M Morachis; Enas A Mahmoud; Adah Almutairi
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 2.  Cellular endocytosis and gene delivery.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ziello; Yan Huang; Ion S Jovin
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 3.  Clinical developments in nanotechnology for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jeremy D Heidel; Mark E Davis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Robby A Petros; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Nanoparticles: a promising modality in the treatment of sarcomas.

Authors:  Michiro Susa; Lara Milane; Mansoor M Amiji; Francis J Hornicek; Zhenfeng Duan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Targeting Cathepsin B for Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Hang Ruan; Susan Hao; Peter Young; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Horiz Cancer Res       Date:  2015 2nd Quarter

7.  N-acetylgalactosamine-functionalized dendrimers as hepatic cancer cell-targeted carriers.

Authors:  Scott H Medina; Venkatesh Tekumalla; Maxim V Chevliakov; Donna S Shewach; William D Ensminger; Mohamed E H El-Sayed
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Biopolymer-based delivery systems for advanced imaging and skeletal tissue-specific therapeutics.

Authors:  Scott C Miller; Dong Wang; Pavla Kopecková; Jindrich Kopecek
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  Nanomedicine: clinical applications of polyethylene glycol conjugated proteins and drugs.

Authors:  Suphiya Parveen; Sanjeeb K Sahoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Mind the gap: a survey of how cancer drug carriers are susceptible to the gap between research and practice.

Authors:  Darren Lars Stirland; Joseph W Nichols; Seiji Miura; You Han Bae
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.