Literature DB >> 11896117

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416 in patients with solid tumors.

Bart C Kuenen1, Lee Rosen, Egbert F Smit, Mandy R N Parson, Marcel Levi, Rita Ruijter, Holger Huisman, Marc A Kedde, Paul Noordhuis, Wim J F van der Vijgh, Godefridus J Peters, Gillian F Cropp, Paul Scigalla, Klaus Hoekman, Herbert M Pinedo, Giuseppe Giaccone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of the combination cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks, and SU5416 (85 and 145 mg/m(2)) intravenously twice weekly. Pharmacokinetics of all three agents, side effects, and antitumor response were investigated in patients with solid tumors amenable to therapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine.
RESULTS: In the first cohort of three patients entered at the 85 mg/m(2) dose, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. In the next cohort (145 mg/m(2)), three patients developed a thromboembolic event. After entry was restricted to patients with low thromboembolic risk, three additional patients enrolled at 145 mg/m(2) developed a thromboembolic event. The dose was then reduced to 85 mg/m(2) in all patients still on the study, and three additional patients were entered on this dose level. In 19 treated patients, eight patients developed nine thromboembolic events (three transient ischemic attacks, two cerebrovascular accidents, and four deep venous thromboses). The most common toxicities observed were those previously reported for SU5416 alone (headache and phlebitis) and for this chemotherapy regimen (nausea, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia). No significant pharmacologic interaction among the three drugs was observed. Response rates were similar to those expected in the patient population selected for this study. Analysis of variables of the coagulation cascade and of vessel wall activation was performed in three patients and showed significant increases in thrombin generation and endothelial cell perturbation in a treatment cycle-dependent manner.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of thromboembolic events, possibly related to the particular regimen tested in this study, discourages further investigation of this regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11896117     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

1.  Model-based drug development: the road to quantitative pharmacology.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Vikram Sinha; S Thomas Forgue; Sophie Callies; Lan Ni; Richard Peck; Sandra R B Allerheiligen
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its amino acid ester prodrug following intravenous and oral administrations in mice.

Authors:  Brian R Thompson; Jian Shi; Hao-Jie Zhu; David E Smith
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Inflammation, TNFα and endothelial dysfunction link lenalidomide to venous thrombosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Georg Aue; Jay Nelson Lozier; Xin Tian; Ann M Cullinane; Susan Soto; Leigh Samsel; Philip McCoy; Adrian Wiestner
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Development of high-content gemcitabine PEGylated liposomes and their cytotoxicity on drug-resistant pancreatic tumour cells.

Authors:  Hongtao Xu; James Paxton; Joanne Lim; Yan Li; Wenli Zhang; Linda Duxfield; Zimei Wu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yun Fan; Neng-ming Lin; Sheng-lin Ma; Lü-hong Luo; Luo Fang; Zhi-yu Huang; Hai-feng Yu; Feng-qin Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for gemcitabine and birinapant in pancreatic cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Xu Zhu; Sheryl Trueman; Robert M Straubinger; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Multi-targeted or single-targeted?

Authors:  Fleur Broekman; Elisa Giovannetti; Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-10

Review 8.  New approaches in angiogenic targeting for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Esther Casado; Javier Cortés
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Intersecting guidelines: administering erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to chronic kidney disease patients with cancer.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Pamela S Becker; Eric H Kraut; Athena T Samaras; Dennis P West
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  What is the risk of intracranial bleeding during anti-VEGF therapy?

Authors:  Craig P Carden; James M G Larkin; Mark A Rosenthal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.