Literature DB >> 11895009

Diagnostic implications of stimulus polarity effects on the auditory brainstem response.

Cynthia G Fowler1, Christopher D Bauch, Wayne O Olsen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether clicks presented in rarefaction or condensation modes produce more accurate diagnostic information. Subjects were 20 consecutive patients who were seen at the Mayo Clinic for unilateral acoustic neuromas. The nontumor ear served as a control to minimize intersubject variability in the latencies. A standard audiologic evaluation was followed by an auditory brainstem response (ABR) test for which the stimuli were rarefaction and condensation clicks. Responses were analyzed for the presence of waves I, III, and V; absolute latencies of waves I, III, and V; interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, and I-V; and interaural latency difference for wave V. The results indicated that measures from both polarities were similar in this set of patients and that neither click polarity provided diagnostic advantages over the other. Recommendations are to collect ABRs to both click polarities individually to obtain the full complement of waves on which to base the diagnostic impression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11895009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  2 in total

1.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

2.  Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Janaina Patricio de Lima; Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga; Tábata Pierini Foelkel; Camila Zotelli Monteiro; Raquel Sampaio Agostinho
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.