Literature DB >> 11894151

Propofol does not modify the hemodynamic status of children with intracardiac shunts undergoing cardiac catheterization.

D Gozal1, A J Rein, A Nir, Y Gozal.   

Abstract

Immobility and cardiovascular stability are required for cardiac catheterization. Pediatric patients need a type of sedation that also allows spontaneous ventilation without supplemental oxygen. Propofol has been adequate in hemodynamically stable patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. However, mild systemic hypotension caused by propofol may increase a preexisting right-to-left shunt. The aim of this study is to evaluate, in pediatric patients scheduled for cardiac catheterization, the effects of propofol on systemic and pulmonic circulations. Fifteen patients aged 18 months to 9 years were studied. After a fast of 4-6 hours for solid food, the patient arrived at the cardiac catheterization suite, where an IV catheter was placed. Usual monitoring was used. For sedation, without supplemental oxygen, patients received 1 mg/kg of fentanyl followed by propofol (1-2 mg/kg) titrated to immobility during preparation of the groin. A continuous infusion of propofol (100 mg/kg/min) was also started to obtain immobility during the procedure. Hemodynamic data, including systemic venous, pulmonary artery and vein, aortic saturations, and pressures, were recorded; Qp and Qs were calculated. The same set of data was re-corded 4 minutes after discontinuation of propofol and when the patient was responding to tactile stimuli. Despite lower pressures during propofol infusion, as compared with those pressures measured after discontinuation of propofol, the extent of the intracardiac shunt remained unchanged. Propofol seems to be an adequate sedative agent for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, including those with intracardiac shunts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11894151     DOI: 10.1007/s002460010280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  5 in total

1.  Is the addition of dexmedetomidine to a ketamine-propofol combination in pediatric cardiac catheterization sedation useful?

Authors:  Ayşe Ülgey; Recep Aksu; Cihangir Bicer; Aynur Akin; Resul Altuntaş; Aliye Esmaoğlu; Ali Baykan; Adem Boyaci
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Propofol and propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  A Akin; A Esmaoglu; G Guler; R Demircioglu; N Narin; A Boyaci
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects in spontaneously breathing children under deep sedation: a feasible and safe concept.

Authors:  Andreas Hanslik; Axel Moysich; K Thorsten Laser; Elisabeth Mlczoch; Deniz Kececioglu; Nikolaus A Haas
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation protocols with the use of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiao-Lan Chen; Wen-Hui Huang; Yi-Han Zheng; Gui-Can Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and ketamine versus propofol and ketamine for procedural sedation in children undergoing minor cardiac procedures in cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Vidya Sagar Joshi; Sandeep S Kollu; Ram Murti Sharma
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.