Literature DB >> 11893073

Secondary metabolism in simulated microgravity.

A L Demain1, A Fang.   

Abstract

We have studied microbial secondary metabolism in a simulated microgravity (SMG) environment provided by NASA rotating-wall bioreactors (RWBs). These reactors were designed to simulate some aspects of actual microgravity that occur in space. Growth and product formation were observed in SMG in all cases studied, i.e., Bacillus brevis produced gramicidin S (GS), Streptomyces clavuligerus made beta-lactam antibiotics, Streptomyces hygroscopicus produced rapamycin, and Escherichia coli produced microcin B17 (MccB17). Of these processes, only GS production was unaffected by SMG; production of the other three products was inhibited. This was determined by comparison with performance in an RWB positioned in a different mode to provide a normal gravity (NG) environment. Carbon source repression by glycerol of the GS process, as observed in shaken flasks, was not observed in the RWBs, whether operated in the SMG or NG mode. The same phenomenon occurred in the case of MccB17 production, with respect to glucose repression. Thus, the negative effects of carbon source on GS and beta-lactam formation are presumably dependent on shear, turbulence, and/or vessel geometry, but not on gravity. Stimulatory effects of phosphate and the precursor L-lysine on beta-lactam antibiotic production, as observed in flasks, also occurred in SMG. An almost complete shift in the localization of produced MccB17 from cells to extracellular medium was observed when E. coli was grown in the RWB under SMG or NG. If a plastic bead was placed in the RWB, accumulation became cellular, as it is in shaken flasks, indicating that sheer stress favors a cellular location. In the case of rapamycin, the same type of shift was observed, but it was less dramatic, i.e., growth in the RWB under SMG shifted the distribution of produced rapamycin from 2/3 cellular:1/3 extracellular to 1/3 cellular:2/3 extracellular. Stress has been shown to induce or promote secondary metabolism in a number of other microbial systems. RWBs provide a low stress SMG environment, which, however, supports only poor production of MccB17, as compared to production in shaken flasks. We wondered whether the poor production in RWBs under SMG is due to the low level of stress, and whether increasing stress in the RWBs would raise the amount of MccB17 formed. We found that increasing shear stress by adding a single Teflon bead to the RWB improved MccB17 production. Although shear stress seems to have a marked positive effect on MccB17 production in SMG, addition of various concentrations of ethanol to RWBs (or to shaken flasks) failed to increase MccB17 production. Ethanol stress merely decreased production and, at higher concentrations, inhibited growth. Interestingly, cells growing in the RWB were much more resistant to the growth- and production-inhibitory effects of ethanol than cells growing in shaken flasks. With respect to S. hygroscopicus, addition of Teflon beads to the RWB reversed the inhibition of growth, but rapamycin production was still markedly inhibited, and the distribution did not revert back to a preferential cellular site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Cell Biology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11893073     DOI: 10.1002/tcr.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Rec        ISSN: 1528-0691            Impact factor:   6.771


  17 in total

1.  Microbial growth at hyperaccelerations up to 403,627 x g.

Authors:  Shigeru Deguchi; Hirokazu Shimoshige; Mikiko Tsudome; Sada-atsu Mukai; Robert W Corkery; Susumu Ito; Koki Horikoshi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments.

Authors:  Cheryl A Nickerson; C Mark Ott; James W Wilson; Rajee Ramamurthy; Duane L Pierson
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Advances in engineered microorganisms for improving metabolic conversion via microgravity effects.

Authors:  Jie Huangfu; Genlin Zhang; Jun Li; Chun Li
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 4.  Modeling Host-Pathogen Interactions in the Context of the Microenvironment: Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Comes of Age.

Authors:  Jennifer Barrila; Aurélie Crabbé; Jiseon Yang; Karla Franco; Seth D Nydam; Rebecca J Forsyth; Richard R Davis; Sandhya Gangaraju; C Mark Ott; Carolyn B Coyne; Mina J Bissell; Cheryl A Nickerson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Low-shear force associated with modeled microgravity and spaceflight does not similarly impact the virulence of notable bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Jason A Rosenzweig; Sandeel Ahmed; John Eunson; Ashok K Chopra
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Effects of low-shear modeled microgravity on cell function, gene expression, and phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Purevdorj-Gage; K B Sheehan; L E Hyman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  An overview of rapamycin: from discovery to future perspectives.

Authors:  Young Ji Yoo; Hanseong Kim; Sung Ryeol Park; Yeo Joon Yoon
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Enhanced Recombinant Protein Production Under Special Environmental Stress.

Authors:  Xinyi Chen; Chun Li; Hu Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effect of modeled reduced gravity conditions on bacterial morphology and physiology.

Authors:  Raja Vukanti; Michael A Model; Laura G Leff
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Transcriptional profiling of protein expression related genes of Pichia pastoris under simulated microgravity.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Chao Wang; Yanli Liu; Imdad Kaleem; Qian Li; Chun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.