Literature DB >> 11892053

The true value of the TRUE Test for allergic contact dermatitis.

T Fischer1, B Kreilgård, H I Maibach.   

Abstract

The development of the thin layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) Test is a history of cooperation between scientists from academia and industry covering several disciplines: medicine, pharmaceutical chemistry, pharmacology, and statistics. The TRUE Test is today a patch test system with documented stability and allergen content. Allergens are incorporated in a dried-in-gel vehicle, which is coated onto a polyester backing to form a patch. Applied to the skin, the allergens are released when the gel becomes moisturized by transepidermal water. This may seem to be a simple technique, but its development required laborious research and solutions to stability and dosage problems. The test has been clinically standardized with serial dilution tests on sensitized patients and validated in comparative multicenter tests. The test is a significant step towards higher reliability of patch testing. Fifteen years of experience and critical investigations are discussed in this article, as are possible improvements such as expansion of the test with new allergens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11892053     DOI: 10.1007/s11882-001-0042-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep        ISSN: 1529-7322            Impact factor:   4.806


  38 in total

1.  Assessment of budesonide patch tests.

Authors:  B Bjarnason; E Flosadóttir; T Fischer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Positive nickel patch tests do not intensify positive reactions to adjacent patch tests with dichromate. Results from a double-blind multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).

Authors:  J Brasch; B Kreilgård; T Henseler; W Aberer; T Fuchs; R Pflüger; U Hoeck; O Gefeller
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  To patch or not to patch: what is your threshold for patch testing?

Authors:  B A Brod; A D Dailey; A F Fransway; A J Scheman; E F Sherertz
Journal:  Am J Contact Dermat       Date:  1999-06

4.  A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: practical implications and limitations.

Authors:  J M Lachapelle
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Proposal for a revised international standard series of patch tests.

Authors:  J M Lachapelle; S I Ale; S Freeman; P J Frosch; C L Goh; M Hannuksela; R Hayakawa; H I Maibach; J E Wahlberg
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Preliminary studies of the TRUE test patch test system in the United States. TRUE Test Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  The thin layer rapid use epicutaneous test (TRUE-test), a new patch test method with high accuracy.

Authors:  T I Fischer; H I Maibach
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Facial dermatitis: patch test results and final diagnoses.

Authors:  A S Katz; E F Sherertz
Journal:  Am J Contact Dermat       Date:  1999-09

9.  Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.

Authors:  C L Goh
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Objective assessment of nickel sulfate patch test reactions with laser Doppler perfusion imaging.

Authors:  B Bjarnason; T Fischer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis in the allergist office.

Authors:  Luz Fonacier; Ernest N Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Rejection of injectable silicone "Bioplastique" used for vocal fold augmentation.

Authors:  Laura Baijens; Renée Speyer; Marieke Linssen; Roeland Ceulen; Johannes Jan Manni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 3.  In vivo studies of substances used in the cosmetic industry.

Authors:  Joanna Igielska-Kalwat; Joanna Gościańska; Beata Witkowska; Izabela Nowak
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.837

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.