Literature DB >> 11891752

Effect of 0.25 T static magnetic field on microcirculation in rabbits.

Juraj Gmitrov1, Chiyoji Ohkubo, Hideyuki Okano.   

Abstract

We showed previously in rabbits that 0.2 and 0.35 T static magnetic field (SMF) modulated systemic hemodynamics by arterial baroreceptors. We now have measured the effect of 0.25 T SMF on microcirculation within cutaneous tissue of the rabbit ear lobe by the rabbit ear chamber (REC) method. Forty experimental runs (20 controls and 20 SMF) were carried out in eight different rabbits with an equal number of control and SMF experiments on each individual. Rabbits were sedated by pentobarbital sodium (5 mg/kg/h, i.v.) during the entire 80 min experiment. SMF was generated by four neodium-iron-boron alloy (Nd2-Fe14-B) magnets (15 x 25 x 30 mm, Neomax, PIP - Tokyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), positioned around the REC on the observing stage of an optical microscope. The direct intravital microscopic observation of the rabbit's ear microvascular net, along with simultaneous blood flow measurement by microphotoelectric plethysmography (MPPG), were performed PRE (20 min, baseline), DURING (40 min), and POST (20 min) magnetic field exposure. The control experiments were performed under the same conditions and according to the same time course, but without magnetic field. Data were analyzed comparing MPPG values and percent change from baseline in the same series, and between corresponding sections of control and SMF runs. In contrast to control series (100+/-0.0%-90.0+/-5.4%-87.7+/-7.1%, PRE-EXPOSURE-POST), after magnetic field exposure we observed increased blood flow (100+/-0.0%-117.8+/-9.6%*-113.8+/-14.0%, *P<0.05) which gradually decreased after exposure cessation. We propose that long exposure of a high level nonuniform SMF probably modifies microcirculatory homeostasis through modulation of the local release of endothelial neurohumoral and paracrine factors that act directly on the smooth muscle of the vascular wall, presumably by affecting ion channels or second messenger systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11891752     DOI: 10.1002/bem.10007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  13 in total

1.  Static magnetic field effect on the arterial baroreflex-mediated control of microcirculation: implications for cardiovascular effects due to environmental magnetic fields.

Authors:  Juraj Gmitrov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Pelvic static magnetic stimulation to control urinary incontinence in older women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marianne C Wallis; Elizabeth A Davies; Lukman Thalib; Susan Griffiths
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2011-08-04

3.  Influence of exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field on neuroendocrine cells and hormones in stomach of rats.

Authors:  Min Eui Hong; Kyu Hyun Yoon; Yoon Yang Jung; Tae Jin Lee; Eon Sub Park; Uy Dong Sohn; Ji Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.016

4.  Is magnetotherapy applied to bilateral hips effective in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Authors:  Yasemin Turan; Kevser Bayraktar; Fatih Kahvecioglu; Engin Tastaban; Elif Aydin; Imran Kurt Omurlu; Isil Karatas Berkit
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Geomagnetic field modulates artificial static magnetic field effect on arterial baroreflex and on microcirculation.

Authors:  Juraj Gmitrov
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 6.  Do Magnetic Fields Have a Place in Treating Vascular Complications in Diabetes?

Authors:  Harvey N Mayrovitz; Raneem Maqsood; Aneil S Tawakalzada
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-10

7.  Influence of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-exposure on patients with erosive gastritis: a randomized, self- and placebo-controlled, double-blind, single centre, pilot study.

Authors:  Márk Juhász; Viktor L Nagy; Hajnal Székely; Dorottya Kocsis; Zsolt Tulassay; János F László
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  The effect of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic field on in vitro fertilization success rate in N MRI mice.

Authors:  Leili Hafizi; Ameneh Sazgarnia; Nezhat Mousavifar; Mohammad Karimi; Saleh Ghorbani; Mohammad Reza Kazemi; Neda Emami Meibodi; Golkoo Hosseini; Hesam Mostafavi Toroghi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  The effect of magnetic fields on wound healing: experimental study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven L Henry; Matthew J Concannon; Gloria J Yee
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-07-25

Review 10.  Static Magnetic Field (SMF) as a Regulator of Stem Cell Fate - New Perspectives in Regenerative Medicine Arising from an Underestimated Tool.

Authors:  Krzysztof Marycz; K Kornicka; M Röcken
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.