Literature DB >> 11891622

The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics.

M Ashraf Aziz1, James C McKenzie, James S Wilson, Robert J Cowie, Sylvanus A Ayeni, Barbara K Dunn.   

Abstract

Major national and international critiques of the medical curriculum in the 1980s noted the following significant flaws: (1) over-reliance on learning by rote memory, (2) insufficient exercise in analysis and synthesis/conceptualization, and (3) failure to connect the basic and clinical aspects of training. It was argued that the invention of computers and related imaging techniques called to question the traditional instruction based on the faculty-centered didactic lecture. In the ensuing reform, which adopted case-based, small group, problem-based learning, time allotted to anatomical instruction was severely truncated. Many programs replaced dissection with prosections and computer-based learning. We argue that cadaver dissection is still necessary for (1) establishing the primacy of the patient, (2) apprehension of the multidimensional body, (3) touch-mediated perception of the cadaver/patient, (4) anatomical variability, (5) learning the basic language of medicine, (6) competence in diagnostic imaging, (7) cadaver/patient-centered computer-assisted learning, (8) peer group learning, (9) training for the medical specialties. Cadaver-based anatomical education is a prerequisite of optimal training for the use of biomedical informatics. When connected to dissection, medical informatics can expedite and enhance preparation for a patient-based medical profession. Actual dissection is equally necessary for acquisition of scientific skills and for a communicative, moral, ethical, and humanistic approach to patient care. Anat Rec (New Anat) 269:20-32, 2002. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11891622     DOI: 10.1002/ar.10046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  37 in total

1.  [Autopsies 2010. Is death still teaching the living?].

Authors:  C Tóth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Going back to dissection in a medical curriculum: the paradigm of Necker-Enfants Malades.

Authors:  O Plaisant; E A Cabanis; V Delmas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  "Between a Rock and a Hard Place": The discordant views among medical teachers about anatomy content in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Inuwa; Varna Taranikanti; Maimouna Al-Rawahy; Sadhana Roychoudhry; Omar Habbal
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2012-02-07

4.  Impact of cadaveric surgical anatomy training on urology residents knowledge: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Serkan Özcan; Emre Huri; İlkan Tatar; Mustafa Sargon; Tolga Karakan; Ömer Faruk Yağlı; Murat Bağcıoğlu; Stéphane Larre
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

Review 5.  Applying problem-based learning to the teaching of anatomy: the example of Harvard Medical School.

Authors:  René Yiou; Daniel Goodenough
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Clinical neuroanatomy module 5 years' experience at the School of Medicine of Padova.

Authors:  Veronica Macchi; Andrea Porzionato; Carla Stecco; Anna Parenti; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 7.  Human body preservation - old and new techniques.

Authors:  Erich Brenner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Analysis of immediate student outcomes following a change in gross anatomy laboratory teaching methodology.

Authors:  Salman Afsharpour; Abigail Gonsalves; Ronald Hosek; Eric Partin
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2018-04-24

9.  Students' perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contents.

Authors:  Min Joon Cho; Young-Il Hwang
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-30

10.  The Use of Anatomical Dissection Videos in Medical Education.

Authors:  Sarah J Greene
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.