Literature DB >> 11890593

Healthcare costs associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a defined community.

C M Callahan1, N N Buchanan, T E Stump.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in older adults remains controversial. Although prior studies have examined the safety of PEG and its impact on nutrition, there are limited data on the economic costs. The purpose of this study is to describe the healthcare costs associated with PEG tube feeding over 1 year.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Small community of approximately 60,000 residents served by two hospital systems. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred five (70%) of 150 patients age 60 and older receiving PEG over a 24-month period in the targeted community who permitted access to their medical records. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were interviewed at baseline and every 2 months for 1 year to obtain information on use of enteral formula, complication rates, and health services use. We obtained inpatient charge data for all hospitalizations and PEG procedures for 1 year.
RESULTS: Censoring patients at death or 1 year post-PEG, the mean number of days of PEG tube feeding was 180 (range 5-365). The average cost for PEG tube feeding for this cohort of patients was $7,488 (median $3,691) in 1997 and 1998. The average daily cost of PEG tube feeding was $87.21 (median $33.50). The estimated cost of providing 1 year of feeding via PEG is $31,832 (median $12,227). The main components of this cost include the initial PEG procedure (29.4%), enteral formula (24.9%), and hospital charges for major complications (33.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct charges associated with PEG tube feeding over 1 year are conservatively estimated at $31,832; there was considerable variation in charges because of the cost of rare but costly major complications. Also, feeding patients via PEG resulted in cost shifts in terms of the primary payor. The economic cost of PEG tube feeding is another consideration in decision making for long-term enteral feeding among older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11890593     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911248.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  8 in total

1.  Do patients with advanced cognitive impairment admitted to hospitals with higher rates of feeding tube insertion have improved survival?

Authors:  Shubing Cai; Pedro L Gozalo; Susan L Mitchell; Sylvia Kuo; Julie P W Bynum; Vincent Mor; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Feeding tubes and health costs postinsertion in nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

Authors:  Deborah Hwang; Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Susan Mitchell
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 3.  The effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement on swallowing and swallow-related outcomes in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shaw; Heather Flowers; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Hope; Louis W C Liu; Rosemary Martino
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Ethics and gastrointestinal artificial feeding.

Authors:  Timothy O Lipman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-08

5.  Effect of oral nutritional supplementation on weight loss and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube rates in patients treated with radiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Haidy Lee; Carole Havrila; Vikki Bravo; Kellie Shantz; Kellie Diaz; James Larner; Paul Read
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Nutritional therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Marian L Evatt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Individualized quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness estimates of proton therapy for patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Clyde B Schechter; Mark Pankuch; Vinai Gondi; Shalom Kalnicki; Madhur K Garg; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cardin
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.