Literature DB >> 11890480

The value of historical control data-scientific advantages for pathologists, industry and agencies.

Ulrich Deschl1, Birgit Kittel, Susanne Rittinghausen, Gerd Morawietz, Manfred Kohler, Ulrich Mohr, Charlotte Keenan.   

Abstract

Historical control tumor data are useful in the interpretation of long-term rodent carcinogenicity bioassays, especially to assess the occurrence of rare tumors and marginally increased tumor incidences. The major prerequisites to compare historical control data with studies under evaluation are the validity and consistency of the respective databases. The RITA (Registry of Industrial Toxicology Animal-data) database for historical data of tumors and pre-neoplastic lesions collects data according to highly standardized procedures including tissue sampling and trimming, histopathology according to internationally harmonized nomenclature and diagnostic criteria, and peer review. All lesions that are entered are unanimously diagnosed according to IARC (Intermational Agency for Research on Cancer)/WHO criteria. The validity of data is additionally confirmed by a complete peer review performed by a database pathologist. Equivocal diagnoses and selected cases are additionally submitted to a panel of RITA pathologists. In the RITA database, there are currently 10,896 rats from 106 studies with more than 17,604 primary tumors and 16,551 pre-neoplastic lesions. The RITA database for historical control data for Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats as well as for different mouse strains is briefly described. Based upon RITA background data, the survival rate of Wistar rats has been consistent over a period of 10 years. The occurrence of tumor-bearing animals also shows a stable percentage over a decade. Additionally, examples of how historical control data may support carcinogenic risk assessment in cases of rare tumors or marginally increased incidences of tumors and pre-neoplastic lesions are given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890480     DOI: 10.1080/01926230252824743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of NTP historical control tumor incidence rates in female Harlan Sprague Dawley and Fischer 344/N Rats.

Authors:  Gregg E Dinse; Shyamal D Peddada; Shawn F Harris; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 1: processes to address issues and most important findings.

Authors:  Robert A Ettlin; Junji Kuroda; Stephanie Plassmann; David E Prentice
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  Sources of variation in baseline gene expression levels from toxicogenomics study control animals across multiple laboratories.

Authors:  Michael J Boedigheimer; Russell D Wolfinger; Michael B Bass; Pierre R Bushel; Jeff W Chou; Matthew Cooper; J Christopher Corton; Jennifer Fostel; Susan Hester; Janice S Lee; Fenglong Liu; Jie Liu; Hui-Rong Qian; John Quackenbush; Syril Pettit; Karol L Thompson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Occurrence of Spontaneous Tumors in the Central Nervous System (CNS) of F344 and SD Rats.

Authors:  Mariko Nagatani; Kayoko Kudo; Seiki Yamakawa; Toko Ohira; Yuko Yamaguchi; Shinichiro Ikezaki; Isamu Suzuki; Tsubasa Saito; Toru Hoshiya; Kazutoshi Tamura; Kazuyuki Uchida
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 1.628

Review 5.  Historical control data for the interpretation of ecotoxicity data: are we missing a trick?

Authors:  Amy C Brooks; Manousos Foudoulakis; Hanna S Schuster; James R Wheeler
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.823

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.