Literature DB >> 11890475

Alteration of liver cell function and proliferation: differentiation between adaptation and toxicity.

Gary M Williams1, Michael J Iatropoulos.   

Abstract

Exposure of experimental animals to biologically effective levels of chemicals, either endogenous or exogenous, the latter of either synthetic or natural origin, elicits a response(s) that reflects the diverse ways in which the various units of organization of an organism deal with chemical perturbation. For some chemicals, an initial response constitutes an adaptive effect that maintains homeostasis. Disruption of this equilibrium at any level of organization leads to an adverse effect, or toxicity. The livers of laboratory animals and humans, like other organs, undergo programmed phases of growth and development, characterized by proliferation followed by differentiation. With organ maturity, the process of differentiation leads to the commitment of differentiated cells to constitutive functions that maintain homeostasis and to specialized functions that serve organismal needs. In the mature livers of all species, proliferation of all cell types subsides to a low level, Thus, the mature liver consists of 2 types of cells: intermediate cells, the hepatocytes, which replicate infrequently, but can respond to signals for replication, and replicating cells, the stem cells, endothelial, Kupffer, and stellate cells (Ito or pericytes), bile duct epithelium, and granular lymphocytes (pit cells). Quantifiable alterations or effects at the molecular level underlie alterations at the organelle level, which in turn lead to alterations at the cellular level, which can ultimately be manifested as a change in the whole organism. Alterations can be quantal (binary), either all or none, as with cell replication, cell necrosis or apoptosis, and cell differentiation, which take place at the cellular level. They can also be graded or continuous (nonbinary), as with enzyme induction, organelle hypertrophy, and extracellular matrix elaboration, occurring either at the intra- or extra (supra) cellular level. Any quantifiable change induced in the function or structure of a cell or tissue constitutes a response or effect. Each of the several types of cell in the liver responds to a given stimulus according to its localization and function. Generally, renewing cells are more vulnerable to chemical injury than intermediate cells, which are largely quiescent. Hepatic adaptive responses usually involve actions of the chemical on cellular regulatory pathways, often receptor mediated, leading to changes in gene expression and ultimately alteration of the metabolome. The response is directed toward maintaining homeostasis through modulation of various cellular and extracellular functions. At all levels of organization, adaptive responses are beneficial in that they enhance the capacity of all units to respond to chemical induced stress, are reversible and preserve viability. Such adaptation at subtoxic exposures is also referred to as hormesis. In contrast, adverse or toxic effects in the liver often involve chemical reaction with cellular macromolecules and produce disruption of homeostasis. Such effects diminish the capacity for response, can be nonreversible at all levels of organization, and can compromise viability. An exposure that elicits an adaptive response can produce toxicity with longer or higher exposures (ie, above a threshold) and the mechanism of action changes with the effective dose. A variety of hepatic adaptive and toxic effects has been identified. Examples of adaptive effects are provided by phenobarbital and ciprofibrate, whereas p-dichlorobenzene and 2-acetylaminofluorene illustrate different toxic effects. The effects of chemicals in the liver are, in general, similar between experimental animals and humans, although exceptions exist. Thus, identification and monitoring of both types of effect are integral in the safety assessment of chemical exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890475     DOI: 10.1080/01926230252824699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  24 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms underlying chemical liver injury.

Authors:  Xinsheng Gu; Jose E Manautou
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.600

2.  Enhanced expression of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases in aniline-induced cell proliferation in rat spleen.

Authors:  Jianling Wang; Gangduo Wang; Huaxian Ma; M Firoze Khan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Metabolomic applications of electrochemistry/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Paul H Gamache; David F Meyer; Michael C Granger; Ian N Acworth
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  In vitro transcriptomic prediction of hepatotoxicity for early drug discovery.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Dan Theodorescu; Ira G Schulman; Jae K Lee
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Mechanisms of adaptation and progression in idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury, clinical implications.

Authors:  Lily Dara; Zhang-Xu Liu; Neil Kaplowitz
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.828

6.  A study on the concentration of heavy metals and histopathological changes in Persian jirds (Mammals; Rodentia), affected by mining activities in an iron ore mine in Iran.

Authors:  Amir Shahsavari; Fatemeh Tabatabaei Yazdi; Zahra Moosavi; Ava Heidari; Pourya Sardari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Residential proximity to abandoned uranium mines and serum inflammatory potential in chronically exposed Navajo communities.

Authors:  Molly E Harmon; Johnnye Lewis; Curtis Miller; Joseph Hoover; Abdul-Mehdi S Ali; Chris Shuey; Miranda Cajero; Selita Lucas; Katherine Zychowski; Bernadette Pacheco; Esther Erdei; Sandy Ramone; Teddy Nez; Melissa Gonzales; Matthew J Campen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  C57BL/6 Substrains Exhibit Different Responses to Acute Carbon Tetrachloride Exposure: Implications for Work Involving Transgenic Mice.

Authors:  Jennifer M McCracken; Prabhakar Chalise; Shawn M Briley; Katie L Dennis; Lu Jiang; Francesca E Duncan; Michele T Pritchard
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2017-02-09

9.  Kupffer Cell Metabolism and Function.

Authors:  Anh Thu Nguyen-Lefebvre; Anatolij Horuzsko
Journal:  J Enzymol Metab       Date:  2015-08-14

10.  Application of a key events dose-response analysis to nutrients: a case study with vitamin A (retinol).

Authors:  A Catharine Ross; Robert M Russell; Sanford A Miller; Ian C Munro; Joseph V Rodricks; Elizabeth A Yetley; Elizabeth Julien
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.