Literature DB >> 11890416

A comparison of enzymatic and molecular approaches to characterize the cellulolytic microbial ecosystems of the rumen and the cecum.

B Michalet-Doreau1, I Fernandez, G Fonty.   

Abstract

We used RNA probes and enzyme activities to compare the cellulolytic microbial ecosystems of the rumen and the cecum. Four rumen- and cecum-cannulated wethers were fed a diet of barley plus hay (60:40). Digesta samples were collected 1 h before feeding and 3, 6, and 9 h after feeding for measurements on microbial populations, and 1 h before feeding and 3 and 6 h after feeding for digestion measurements, pH, and VFA. Polysaccharidase and glycosidase specific activities of solid-adherent microorganisms were measured respectively by the amount of reducing sugars released from xylan or avicel or p-nitrophenol from the p-nitrophenol derivatives of xylose and glucose. The distribution and amounts of the three main cellulolytic bacterial species (Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens) were determined by dot-blot hybridization using specific 16SrRNA-targeting probes. Enzyme activities were higher in the rumen than in the cecum and before feeding than at 3 h after feeding. The sum of the three cellulolytic bacterial species represented, on average, 4.5% of the total bacterial RNA in the two compartments and did not vary with sampling time. The cellulolytic bacterial community structure was different in the two compartments, with F. succinogenes as the main species in the rumen and R. flavefaciens in the cecum. The lower cellulolytic activity in the cecum than in the rumen could not be ascribed to any difference in the structure of the cellulolytic bacterial community between these two compartments, and other hypotheses related to digestion are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890416     DOI: 10.2527/2002.803790x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

Review 1.  The use of molecular techniques based on ribosomal RNA and DNA for rumen microbial ecosystem studies: a review.

Authors:  Weidong Deng; Dongmei Xi; Huaming Mao; Metha Wanapat
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Ecological and physiological characterization shows that Fibrobacter succinogenes is important in rumen fiber digestion - review.

Authors:  Y Kobayashi; T Shinkai; S Koike
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  ScaC, an adaptor protein carrying a novel cohesin that expands the dockerin-binding repertoire of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17 cellulosome.

Authors:  Marco T Rincón; Jennifer C Martin; Vincenzo Aurilia; Sheila I McCrae; Garry J Rucklidge; Martin D Reid; Edward A Bayer; Raphael Lamed; Harry J Flint
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A novel cell surface-anchored cellulose-binding protein encoded by the sca gene cluster of Ruminococcus flavefaciens.

Authors:  Marco T Rincon; Tadej Cepeljnik; Jennifer C Martin; Yoav Barak; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer; Harry J Flint
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Carbohydrate utilization by enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine intestinal content.

Authors:  Yolande Bertin; Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand; Catherine Robbe-Masselot; Alexandra Durand; Anne de la Foye; Josée Harel; Paul S Cohen; Tyrell Conway; Evelyne Forano; Christine Martin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  Populations of select cultured and uncultured bacteria in the rumen of sheep and the effect of diets and ruminal fractions.

Authors:  Jill Stiverson; Mark Morrison; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Study of rumen metagenome community using qPCR under different diets.

Authors:  K M Singh; P R Pandya; A K Tripathi; G R Patel; S Parnerkar; R K Kothari; C G Joshi
Journal:  Meta Gene       Date:  2014-02-19

8.  Bacterial diversity dynamics associated with different diets and different primer pairs in the rumen of Kankrej cattle.

Authors:  Dipti W Pitta; Nidhi Parmar; Amrut K Patel; Nagaraju Indugu; Sanjay Kumar; Karsanbhai B Prajapathi; Anand B Patel; Bhaskar Reddy; Chaitanya Joshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Physically Effective Neutral Detergent Fiber Content on Intake, Digestibility, and Chewing Activity in Fattening Heifer Fed Total Mixed Ration.

Authors:  Mi Rae Oh; Heeok Hong; Hong Liang Li; Byong Tae Jeon; Cheong Hee Choi; Yu Ling Ding; Yu Jiao Tang; Eun Kyung Kim; Se Young Jang; Hye Jin Seong; Sang Ho Moon
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Gossypol Exhibited Higher Detrimental Effect on Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics of Low-Forage in Comparison with High-Forage Mixed Feeds.

Authors:  Wei-Kang Wang; Yan-Lu Wang; Wen-Juan Li; Qi-Chao Wu; Sheng-Li Li; Hong-Jian Yang
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.