Literature DB >> 11890394

Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in finishing pigs.

Y Hyun1, M Ellis.   

Abstract

The effects of four group sizes (2, 4, 8, and 12 pigs per pen) and two single-space feeder types (conventional and electronic feed intake recording equipment [FIRE]) on feed intake, growth performance, and feeding patterns were determined in 208 crossbred finishing pigs (equal numbers of barrows and gilts) between 84.4 (SD = 0.81) to 112.8 (SD = 1.08) kg BW over a 4-wk period. Pigs were given ad libitum access to a corn-soybean meal-based diet (15.9% CP; 0.79% lysine; 3,328 kcal ME/kg). The floor space allowance was 0.9 m2/pig for all treatments. Growth rates were not different for the two feeder types; however, feed intake was lower and gain:feed ratio higher for pigs on the FIRE feeders (P < 0.01). Feed intake, growth rate, and gain:feed ratio were not different (P > 0.05) among the group sizes. Number of feeder visits per day decreased and feed intake per visit, feeder occupation time per visit, feed consumption rate, and percentage of time the feeder was occupied increased with group size (P < 0.05). Feed intake per visit had the strongest correlation with daily feed intake (r = 0.54; P < 0.01) and was negatively correlated with gain:feed ratio (r = -0.38; P < 0.01). However, the correlations between growth performance and other feeding pattern traits were relatively weak (r < or = 0.30). As group size increased, diurnal variation in number of feeder visits and feed consumed per hour decreased. There was no difference in time spent sitting and standing between the two feeder types. The proportion of time spent eating was generally lower for the larger groups on both feeders. The proportion of time spent lying was similar across group sizes for pigs on the conventional feeders but was greater for pigs in the larger groups on the FIRE feeders. This study suggests that finishing pigs can maintain feed intake and growth rate by changing feeding behavior as group size increases from 2 to 12.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890394     DOI: 10.2527/2002.803568x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.

Authors:  John F Patience; Alejandro Ramirez
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 2.  The Feeding Behaviour Habits of Growing-Finishing Pigs and Its Effects on Growth Performance and Carcass Quality: A Review.

Authors:  Marta Fornós; Santos Sanz-Fernández; Encarnación Jiménez-Moreno; Domingo Carrión; Josep Gasa; Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Estimation of direct and social effects of feeding duration in growing pigs using records from automatic feeding stations.

Authors:  Belcy K Angarita; Junjie Han; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Sarah K Chewning; Kaitlin E Wurtz; Janice M Siegford; Catherine W Ernst; Juan Pedro Steibel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Behaviour of fattening pigs fed with liquid feed and dry feed.

Authors:  Mate Zoric; Sven-Erik Johansson; Per Wallgren
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 5.  Fasting Finisher Pigs before Slaughter Influences Pork Safety, Pork Quality and Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Bert Driessen; Louis Freson; Johan Buyse
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Exploring the role of gut microbiota in host feeding behavior among breeds in swine.

Authors:  Yuqing He; Francesco Tiezzi; Jeremy Howard; Yijian Huang; Kent Gray; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Using Passive Infrared Detectors to Record Group Activity and Activity in Certain Focus Areas in Fattening Pigs.

Authors:  Naemi Von Jasmund; Anna Wellnitz; Manuel Stephan Krommweh; Wolfgang Büscher
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.