Literature DB >> 11890331

Monitoring the rates of composite events with censored data in phase II clinical trials.

Ying Kuen Cheung1, Peter F Thall.   

Abstract

In many phase II clinical trials, interim monitoring is based on the probability of a binary event, response, defined in terms of one or more time-to-event variables within a time period of fixed length. Such outcome-adaptive methods may require repeated interim suspension of accrual in order to follow each patient for the time period required to evaluate response. This may increase trial duration, and eligible patients arriving during such delays either must wait for accrual to reopen or be treated outside the trial. Alternatively, monitoring may be done continuously by ignoring censored data each time the stopping rule is applied, which wastes information. We propose an adaptive Bayesian method that eliminates these problems. At each patient's accrual time, an approximate posterior for the response probability based on all of the event-time data is used to compute an early stopping criterion. Application to a leukemia trial with a composite event shows that the method can reduce trial duration substantially while maintaining the reliability of interim decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890331     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00089.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

Review 1.  Statistics in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie J Green; Donna K Pauler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  A Bayesian adaptive design for two-stage clinical trials with survival data.

Authors:  Uttam Bandyopadhyay; Atanu Biswas; Rahul Bhattacharya
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Suspension of accrual in phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yimei Li; Rosemarie Mick; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Phase II trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced and metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephen L Richey; Pheroze Tamboli; Chaan S Ng; E Lin; Zita D Lim; John C Araujo; Eric Jonasch; Padmanee Sharma; Lance C Pagliaro; Nizar M Tannir
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Bayesian decision theoretic two-stage design in phase II clinical trials with survival endpoint.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Jeremy M G Taylor; Scott M Schuetze
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A Bayesian design for phase II clinical trials with delayed responses based on multiple imputation.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Suyu Liu; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Risk-group-specific dose finding based on an average toxicity score.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A Bayesian hierarchical monitoring design for phase II cancer clinical trials: Incorporating information on response duration into monitoring rules.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Junsheng Ma; Chunyan Cai; Naval Daver; Jing Ning
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Comparing Bayesian early stopping boundaries for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Liyun Jiang; Fangrong Yan; Peter F Thall; Xuelin Huang
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 1.234

10.  Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities.

Authors:  L Douglas Case; Timothy M Morgan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.